28
Cheshire / Re: Isaac Dixon buried Elworth nr Sandbach 10 march 1868
« on: Sunday 18 June 17 09:21 BST (UK) »
Death of Isaiah Dixon registered March Quarter 1868 Congleton.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
29
Cheshire / Re: Isaac Dixon buried Elworth nr Sandbach 10 march 1868
« on: Sunday 18 June 17 07:48 BST (UK) »Amondg - I think you read my reply incorrectly.
This may explain why he is listed as Isaa in 1841 and it would be his father not his uncle.
1841Isaiah/Isaac and brother Thomas are with probable father Thomas
1871 Isaacs son is living with his uncle Thomas.
Nice find by the way
30
Cheshire / Re: Isaac Dixon buried Elworth nr Sandbach 10 march 1868
« on: Saturday 17 June 17 22:44 BST (UK) »
Is son Thomas born 1861 living with his uncle Thomas Dixon in Westmorland on the 1871 census?
If so is this Thomas and brother Isaac with possible father on the 1841 census:
Parish of Rydal and Loughrigg, Westmorland
Thomas Dixon, 40, Ag. Lab, Not born in County
Thomas Dixon, 15, Not born in County
Isaa Dixon, 9, Not born in County
Mo
If so is this Thomas and brother Isaac with possible father on the 1841 census:
Parish of Rydal and Loughrigg, Westmorland
Thomas Dixon, 40, Ag. Lab, Not born in County
Thomas Dixon, 15, Not born in County
Isaa Dixon, 9, Not born in County
Mo
31
Cheshire / Re: trying to find William Ford died abt 1965 tameside burial
« on: Wednesday 14 June 17 18:41 BST (UK) »
His death was registered in the High Peak district, but sadly his birth date hasn`t been added so no wonder I couldn`t find a William Ford born 27th December, 1904 
. It was his probate that was proved at Sheffield, he didn`t die there.
Mo
. It was his probate that was proved at Sheffield, he didn`t die there.Mo
32
Devon / Re: Amery family
« on: Thursday 08 June 17 23:59 BST (UK) »
From my own personal research the parish records available online for Devon are extremely hit and miss. You just have to put them on the back burner and see what appears in the future. Not all records have been transcribed, in fact hardly any.
Mo
Mo
34
Lancashire / Re: Up. Nooks Clitheroe
« on: Tuesday 06 June 17 08:32 BST (UK) »
If I have got the right man I don`t think they split up, but moved to Clitheroe for a couple of years until he died. If you check Lancashirebmd a daughters birth was registered 1845. Her death was registered in Blackburn 1847.
Mo
Mo
35
Technical Help / Re: Ancestry home page has changed
« on: Friday 26 May 17 17:18 BST (UK) »
I had to log in this morning which must be the first time in around two years, but nothing has changed. Are you using the .com or .co.uk site?
Mo
Mo
36
Lancashire / Re: Ambrose Hall, Woodplumpton
« on: Thursday 25 May 17 13:56 BST (UK) »
I believe this is it: