Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jamila169

Pages: 1 2 [3]
19
Derbyshire / Re: Radulfus Cutt son of Richard
« on: Friday 11 August 17 00:38 BST (UK)  »
I think there were some shenanigans with my lot, Fanny and George's daughter Mary has a baptism date of 1815, but her given age on all of the censuses she appears on makes her younger than that, I need to look at the actual register to see if theres a mistranscription. I've got someone I think is her in the examinations record pregnant at age 16 in 1833 being examined to return to Bolsover from Blidworth (Parents settled in Scarcliffe) . She was removed to Scarcliffe in the same year pregnant. The Fanny Cutts that Dobby mentioned earlier in the thread as being in the bastardy records in 1831 is also in Scarcliffe. But I've not seen any mention of Fanny settling in either Bolsover or Scarcliffe, but then again if she worked and stayed with family she might not appear in the records

20
Derbyshire / Re: Radulfus Cutt son of Richard
« on: Thursday 10 August 17 23:46 BST (UK)  »
That's what was nagging me about Mather, it wasn't solid enough because of the other possible one, I'll try chasing up the Fox connection and see if she's the one. I've found no connection yet with the N Wingfield ones , but it's not beyond the realms of possibility that they're branches of the same family

21
Derbyshire / Re: Radulfus Cutt son of Richard
« on: Thursday 10 August 17 20:03 BST (UK)  »
Thanks so much Claire,  these people have been the bane of my life for years now, my Grandma told me everyone she knew about which went back to her great grandparents, but the pre 1840s Georges are a pain

22
Derbyshire / Re: Radulfus Cutt son of Richard
« on: Thursday 10 August 17 02:12 BST (UK)  »
resurrecting this one from the dead , I've recently got back to the Cutts after banging my head on other parts of my tree and started a new Bolsover Cutt tree to try and untangle everyone starting with the 1911 census and working back . George and Fanny are exercising my brain a bit because from what you're saying Bolsover Fanny isn't Frances Fox, but I'm having trouble with her being Fanny Mather as well (which is what people on the site that shall not be named seem to think) I've disentangled the 1841 census where George Junior is in the nick for the poaching incident and Mary's children George and Emma are listed as belonging to Fanny (can't be hers, she would have been 52 when the elder was born) but not knowing for sure which Fanny/Frances married George (D.1841) is messing stuff up somewhat. has anything come up since the last post that can shed a light on these annoying relatives of mine?

Pages: 1 2 [3]