34
« on: Friday 15 October 21 05:14 BST (UK) »
Hi Jadeish
You did not mention that both Thomas and Mary get very much older in 1861 than they claim to be in 1851. Suddenly they both claim to have been born about 1798. There is no Thomas Brown baptism at Brandesburton between 1798 and 1810 so it looks like a bit of obfuscation is going on.
The baptism of William Ward at Sinnington states that Mary was a single woman. So it seems to me they are presenting as man and wife but are not married probably due to Thomas being married already.
There is a burial of a Francis Brown at Brandesburton in 1832. He is aged 53 and of Arnold. There are two places called Arnold in nearby parishes. One at Long Riston and one at Swine. Francis could be a brother or cousin of Thomas.
Sinnington is quite a way from Brandesburton. It's in the North Riding about 40 miles distant. Coulton is also in the North Riding and not that close to Sinnington. It's all a bit muddled. It might be worth seeing if there was a Bastardy Bond for the father of William. There could be some information about Mary.
Did you look into David Agar who is a visitor in 1851? Often Visitors turn out to be family.
Certainly Thomas and Mary are hiding something. How did they meet? Hiring Fair?
Finding their Deaths/Burials would be a priority to see what age they are suposed to be when they died.
Venelow
Canada