Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - venelow

Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60
496
Cornwall / Re: Phrase: Born South of the Horsepool
« on: Saturday 02 August 14 16:12 BST (UK)  »
Hi Nell and Rena

Thanks for your responses. Horsepool road at Connor Downs seems a promising lead as it is in the area of Penwith. Presumably there was a pool there at one time. 

The Breage Horsepool is also a contender but does not seem to be on modern maps as there is no map reference for it on Genuki Breage pages.

I feel I'm getting closer. Time to look for some old maps.

Thank you to all responders.

Venelow
Canada

497
Cornwall / Re: Phrase: Born South of the Horsepool
« on: Friday 01 August 14 19:26 BST (UK)  »
Hi Rena and KGarrard

I should clarify my post. Maybe I should not have capitalized horsepool. A place in east Cornwall does not seem to be right for what the person who used the phrase was talking about.

He was in the far west of Cornwall. His family had lived in the west of Cornwall area for generations. I have traced eight generations back from him so far and all confined to the West Penwith area.

The phrase was "the horsepool" so I take it to mean an actual place where horses were taken to drink or bathe. 

I am trying to find out if this was a common phrase that other people remember their older relatives using.
It seemed to imply that only the best Cornish folks were those born south of the horsepool. Maybe it was peculiar to him alone.

Thanks for the pic of the Horse Wash Rena. Seems to have provided a lot of entertainment for the locals.

Venelow

498
Cornwall / Phrase: Born South of the Horsepool
« on: Friday 01 August 14 02:45 BST (UK)  »
Dear Cousins:

 "Born South of the Horsepool"

This is a phrase I first heard 45 years ago, made by an inhabitant of West Cornwall who was born before WWI.

I have Googled the phrase to no effect.

I take it to mean people born in a very specific area, possibly West Penwith or the Penwith Peninsular.

Does anyone else recall this phrase?  Where was the Horsepool exactly?

Venelow
Canada

499
Hi Willsy

Thanks for the link.  Unfortunately, there is no burial for a Julia Jane Tonkin at St Mary's.

There is a burial for a Jane Tonkin aged 2 years but I think that was a child of Uriah Tonkin and Hannah. That family went to South Africa in 1841.

Since her father was a mariner, the family may have moved about a bit.

I have found Rachel's GRO death reference in Dec Q 1870. She was a widow in Jersey in 1851 and was living in Penzance in 1861. However that won't help me find her maiden name.

Cheers
Venelow

500
I am posting this to the Common Room as multiple locations could be involved.

James Tonkin and Elizabeth Midlen gave their son William (bpt. 1796 Paul, Cornwall)  his mother's name as a middle name. Due to people being, illiterate, unsure of spelling, hard of hearing etc. his name was rendered as William Middling Tonkin. Elizabeth's father was actually William Medlyn so the name has many variations.

William Middling / Medlin had a child, Julia Jane, baptized at St Mary's Penzance on Jan 28 1831. His name is recorded as William Medlin Tonkin and the child's mother is called Rachel. It is recorded that Julia Jane Tonkin was born on 22 Oct 1829. The place of birth is not mentioned. When the baptism took place the family were living in Penzance and her father's occupation was Master Mariner.

In 1841 William and Rachel are living in St Helier, Jersey. Both 45 years old and he is a Seaman. There is a Julia in the household but she does not have the same surname and is too old to be their daughter who should only be about 11 or 12 years old.  Have to assume that Julia Jane Tonkin is deceased or living elsewhere.

In 1851 Rachel Tonkin is living alone in St Helier, Jersey aged 56years old and is a widow.  A database of Master Mariners for Jersey states William Tonkin lost at sea on the Zibiah 1851.

I am looking for the marriage of William Middling/ Midlen/ Medlyn/  TONKIN to Rachel UNKNOWN and also the death of Julia Jane Tonkin or her marriage if some how she was not with her parents in 1841.

Hope someone can help.

Venelow
Canada

501
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: What is John Swindel(l)s occupation
« on: Wednesday 16 July 14 22:36 BST (UK)  »
Sieves it is, Stonechat and Kay.

A search on the word Cive on Access to Archives (A2A) brings up this reference:

 DD/E/146/40  19 March 1769

Wm. {William?} Parker for £1. 7s. 11d. Sieves and riddles bottoming; nine hundred and a half of plants 6s. 4d. Endorsed: Paid the Cive bottomer and osier man Parker £1. 12s..

[Nottinghamshire Archives, Edge of Strelley]

Since an osier man is mentioned the sieves are woven willow rather than wire mesh.

Currently A2A is here:
http://apps.nationalarchives.gov.uk/a2a/advanced-search.aspx?tab=1

But a note on the site states, "This data will soon be incorporated into Discovery, the only place to access descriptions of records held by The National Archives and thousands of archives around the UK."

A2A has been one of my favourite sites for years. I have found all sorts of helpful clues and information there. It is especially useful for research prior to the Census and Civil Registration era.

Venelow


502
The Common Room / Re: False information of maps
« on: Wednesday 16 July 14 16:57 BST (UK)  »
 To Malcom:

Easter Eggs.

Ven.

503
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry TV Advert - legal, honest and truthful?
« on: Saturday 12 July 14 18:13 BST (UK)  »
True, Erato.

I forgot the US census is bound by a different release period rather than 100 years. The Western Canadian Census of 1916 was released a few years early and I found a still living (92 years) relative on that. However the ads I've seen in Canada seem to be aimed at younger people than those of your father's or my age. I do know it's unlikely I will see myself on a British census.

Venelow

504
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry TV Advert - legal, honest and truthful?
« on: Saturday 12 July 14 17:22 BST (UK)  »
I was under the impression that Ancestry will automatically hide living persons entered into online trees so typing in one's own name and DOB is unlikely to produce a result unless someone has marked a living person as dead. Not sure if I am correct about this as I never put living people on my Ancestry Trees and usually stop two generations back from the eldest generation of currently living persons.

However, I know there are trees on Ancestry that have my parents' names but they are both deceased. A general search of all records for my name and YOB will produce only my GRO birth index reference. So I am always amused when Gemma Woollard and Louise Abbey find their families so easily.

The ads themselves do convey a good sense of where tracing one's ancestors might lead, even to the ultimate brick wall of the foundling child. (I have one of those in my tree)

However, like most advertising there is an element of not being completely straight forward about the situation - but hey, got to get people to try the product.

It's just a pity that so many do not bother with the very good advice that Ancestry has on how to do genealogy by proving ancestors and how to avoid pitfalls and errors that others might copy. I see too many trees where it is obvious the owner has either not looked at the record they have linked to or does not have the capacity to analyze the information contained therein.

Venelow

Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60