Thanks for the update.
I will try and get my mind round it all, but its a bit early in the morning here so it may take a short while.
Remember dates of baptism and dates of birth can often be years apart.
By the way, have you tried to see if your George slipped through your net as a Holman rather than a Holden?
Re "the widow" Winefred Wells.
Looks as though you have cousins marrying here.
It would also seem that Winifred's parents were probably cousins as well.
That should throw most family tree computer programes into total confusion.
Will get back to you later
Roy G
Yep definately confusing. I'm sure the two Holden groups are related but as they are from different areas it is hard to work out how and find that link. Winifred Wells's Holden ancestors were from Cuckfield (and possibly Hurtspierpoint) while those of George Holden were almost certainly from the Brighton area.
I hadn't considered Holman as an alternative so thanks for that thought. I've tried practically all other variations - Holden, Holdan, Hulden, Huldan, Holdon, Halden (which is what the George born 1818 is down as on the 1851 census), Hilden, Holding, Holdin, even Holdun. I'll give holman a go today.
As you say birth and baptism dates can often be months or years apart, Daniel Wells (father of Winifred Wells) was born in 1793 but baptised as an adult in 1829 (he is actually recorded in the register as an adult baptism)! So i may have to check post 1817 for the baptism of George.
All the details of the 1814 George fit (i.e right father, right father's occupation, right area) so this could be mine, but then again he appears to be alive and married to a woman called Jane in 1861 when my George was clearly dead! So maybe that's not him.
I'm sure Stephen Holden and Jane Holden are cousins and I'm trying to working that out this morning. Maybe my George links in with their ancestors somehow.
Anyhow enough waffle from me. I need to go and draw a tree out so I can get my head around all these Holdens lol.
Thanks again
Matt