Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - carol8353

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 1971
1
The Common Room / Re: GRO Missing Years Death
« on: Thursday 18 April 24 22:40 BST (UK)  »
Not found on FreeBMD which has coverage for the 1970s. Can you check your source information and repost?
Ray

Do you have his date of birth,by 1972,if that info was known it was included in the death indexes.

2
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Help with birth entry
« on: Wednesday 10 April 24 22:36 BST (UK)  »
Looks like 50 Old Cross Street

Yep that's what I saw it as too. ;D

3
One thing BA on the 1921 Scottish census means Both parents alive. Nothing about adoption.


Dorrie

I agree with Dorrie, according to the Scotland's People 1921 census returns page,the following is true.

https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/record-guides/census-returns#Household-returns-1921-census

Marriage/Orphanhood

BA - Both parents alive
FD - Father dead
MD - Mother dead
BD - Both parents dead

4
The Common Room / Re: Help determining a Birth date range
« on: Tuesday 27 February 24 22:32 GMT (UK)  »
My mother in law died early in 1997 aged 79.
Her sister (Irish!) told everyone that she was 80,as she would have been that age in the August.
So the remembrance cards that were printed said she was 80.
Don't trust ages until you've seen a birth cert.

5
The Common Room / Re: PDF Birth Certificates
« on: Wednesday 24 January 24 13:41 GMT (UK)  »

6
London and Middlesex / Re: Ruislip, Northwood and Eastcote Local History Society
« on: Monday 15 January 24 07:23 GMT (UK)  »
I wonder if someone from the Harrow Local History group could help?

https://headstonemanor.org/the-collection/local-history-collection/

7
The Common Room / Re: Missing GRO death?
« on: Saturday 23 December 23 11:44 GMT (UK)  »


Dundee, Is it possible to order a digital copy that way  :-\

I wondered the same thing Rosie  :)

8
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: CAN ANYONE PLEASE READ OR ENHANCE……?
« on: Sunday 05 November 23 12:29 GMT (UK)  »
Looking at the original image, as posted by ShaunJ, I think Mary Ann first attempted to sign with her new married name, Porter, when she should have signed Wicks (which she then added). This was a mistake occasionally made by brides. In this case there appears to be a smudge around the name, which may be an attempt to erase it.

My thoughts exactly............cos I did it myself in 1973 !!!

9
Technical Help / Re: Message boards missing on Ancestry
« on: Saturday 04 November 23 22:41 GMT (UK)  »

Bit harsh, Biggles.
It's more the lack of response/gratitude from many of the OPs on those boards that deters some of us from helping them nowadays.
A lot of the zero reply posts are of the kind that are unlikely to get much of a response anywhere.
There are still some wonderful people on the ancestry boards.

And don't forget one of our biggest bugbears,where you spend ages answering a query.Only to find an over zealous moderator has moved it to another board,never to be seen or found again. ;D

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 1971