55
Technical Help / Re: can not open and run family tree maker 6
« on: Saturday 12 September 15 19:28 BST (UK) »
Hi thanks for the info
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
56
Technical Help / can not open and run family tree maker 6
« on: Saturday 12 September 15 17:42 BST (UK) »
Hi
I have a new lap top with widows 8.1, and cannot open and run my family tree maker 6, I have the original installation disk , but still cannot open up my work , as the computer does not recognise the file
I have a new lap top with widows 8.1, and cannot open and run my family tree maker 6, I have the original installation disk , but still cannot open up my work , as the computer does not recognise the file
57
The Common Room / Re: dead parents on 1755
« on: Wednesday 26 August 15 14:56 BST (UK) »
Hi, thank you, I will have to go to local archives, and search the parish records, thank you for the information
58
The Common Room / Re: dead parents on 1755
« on: Wednesday 26 August 15 14:35 BST (UK) »
Hi
the family lived in worsbrough , st. Marys church is where they were baptised and buried, the children from the first marriage were.
john tasker 1735
Mary tasker
martha tasker 1743
second marriage
john tasker 1746
sarah tasker
the family lived in worsbrough , st. Marys church is where they were baptised and buried, the children from the first marriage were.
john tasker 1735
Mary tasker
martha tasker 1743
second marriage
john tasker 1746
sarah tasker
59
The Common Room / dead parents on 1755
« on: Tuesday 25 August 15 21:35 BST (UK) »
Hi
I have a ancestor whos first wife died in childbirth in 1742, and remarried in 1743, then both husband and second wife died in 1755, and 1756, what would have happened to the children
I have a ancestor whos first wife died in childbirth in 1742, and remarried in 1743, then both husband and second wife died in 1755, and 1756, what would have happened to the children
60
Yorkshire (West Riding) / Re: missimg husband 1925
« on: Thursday 23 July 15 16:03 BST (UK) »
Hi
Thank you, its worth a try
Thank you, its worth a try
61
Yorkshire (West Riding) / Re: missimg husband 1925
« on: Wednesday 22 July 15 19:04 BST (UK) »
Hi
the rolls for barnsley are at wakefield, I have searched the archives at barnsley, thats where I got my information from, so its wakefield next
the rolls for barnsley are at wakefield, I have searched the archives at barnsley, thats where I got my information from, so its wakefield next
62
Yorkshire (West Riding) / Re: missimg husband 1925
« on: Wednesday 22 July 15 17:20 BST (UK) »
Hi
I wanted to know if my grandparents were still living together in 1925, as the child was bapt private and at home, every one in the family knew he wasnt my grandads, my grand mother wasnt a church person, so I thoight the electral rolls would answer the question.
On the childs birth cert. His second name is the surname of suspect father, and his last name is my grandads name.
so I thought they may have separated
I wanted to know if my grandparents were still living together in 1925, as the child was bapt private and at home, every one in the family knew he wasnt my grandads, my grand mother wasnt a church person, so I thoight the electral rolls would answer the question.
On the childs birth cert. His second name is the surname of suspect father, and his last name is my grandads name.
so I thought they may have separated
63
Yorkshire (West Riding) / Re: missimg husband 1925
« on: Saturday 18 July 15 18:02 BST (UK) »
Hi
Thank you, I have a odd feeling that in 1925 a child was born and the father had left the mother, but on free B.M.D he is still listed as the dad, on the bapts. its a different story there is no father ,
Thank you, I have a odd feeling that in 1925 a child was born and the father had left the mother, but on free B.M.D he is still listed as the dad, on the bapts. its a different story there is no father ,