Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alexander.

Pages: 1 ... 364 365 366 [367] 368 369 370 ... 372
3295
England / Re: A little confusion with pre 1752 calendar dates
« on: Tuesday 14 July 09 01:49 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for that, though I've noticed that not all programs let me use that notation. My tree on Ancestry seemed to particularly dislike writing it as 1732/3...

Alexander

3296
England / Re: A little confusion with pre 1752 calendar dates
« on: Monday 13 July 09 19:57 BST (UK)  »
Right, so the "new style" dates are:
John 25 Mar 1732
Richard 15 Feb 1733
Mary 19 Feb 1734

That all makes sense, thanks a lot. I assumed that John was born after Richard simply because one date was after the other, I should have considered it could have been the other way around.

Thanks!
Alexander

3297
England / A little confusion with pre 1752 calendar dates
« on: Monday 13 July 09 18:58 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

I have just found a couple of my ancestors in the IGI before 1752 and the dates are making me get very confused. The couple, Richard & Sarah Redford, had the following children, all baptised very close:

Richard, bap. 15 Feb 1732
John, bap. 25 Mar 1732
Mary, bap. 19 Feb 1733

I'm having trouble with trying to get the dates to fit together with the old and new style calendars. It doesn't help that John seems to have been baptised on "new year's day". Any ideas?

Thanks,
Alexander

3298
Surrey Completed Look up Requests / Re: Albury marriage lookup
« on: Sunday 12 July 09 01:39 BST (UK)  »
On the Surrey Plus Wills Index website, I just found a will for John Butcher of Cranleigh/Cranley in 1774 that mentions his cousin Miss Sarah Harbroe. This Sarah was the daughter of the Sarah Butcher who first married Richard Redford. Sorry it’s quite confusing. This indicates that John Butcher’s father was Sarah Butcher’s brother, so maybe the Cranley baptism is the correct one, not the Shere one. Unfortunately this will is not transcribed on the website so I'll have to find a copy of the will to get any further.

3299
Surrey Completed Look up Requests / Re: Albury marriage lookup
« on: Saturday 11 July 09 16:52 BST (UK)  »
Thank you for what you found, Jane. This one is a bit tricky because Richard Redford died in 1733, and I think they had two children - at least one of whom died in infancy. Richard Redford was the son of another Richard Redford, so it's been a bit difficult to distinguish between the two. It seems there's been a long line of Richard Redfords.

Regarding Sarah Butcher's baptism, I did see the IGI entry for the one in 1708 at Shere. There is also one in 1707 in Cranley. The thing is that after her first husband died, she remarried in Cranley in 1734. That makes me wonder if she originally came from Cranley, and after her husband died she went back there. The one in Shere is also a good possibility too though since it's so near by. That why I was hoping I might find a marriage license for them as I have found them for some of my other ancestors in the period...they often help a lot with places and ages. Sarah was 25 at her second marriage in 1734, and 38 when she died in 1746.

Thanks,
Alexander

3300
Surrey Completed Look up Requests / Albury marriage lookup
« on: Saturday 11 July 09 01:35 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

According to the IGI my ancestor Sarah Butcher married Richard Redford on 9 Oct 1729 at Albury, Surrey. Would it be possible for anyone to check the original entry to see if any more details (witnesses, etc.) might have been given? I have searched for a marriage license online too but with no success, though they've helped a lot on other parts of the family tree. Any help is very much appreciated as I've gotten a bit stuck on Sarah's line since there were quite a few Sarah Butchers in the area.

Thanks,
Alexander

3301
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Unreadable words in will
« on: Friday 10 July 09 13:44 BST (UK)  »
I think you guys have got it. Thanks a lot!  ;D

Alexander

3302
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Unreadable words in will - COMPLETED
« on: Friday 10 July 09 05:36 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

I am quite a novice at deciphering old wills and I've finally managed to get through this one - though it did take me a few days! There are still two spots where I just can't work out what it is supposed to say. I'm also not sure why there is a big blank space in the first one. Any help much appreciated.

#1
said County of Sussex and now in the Tenure or
Occupation of                           his [undet…ants?]
or [assio…s?] To hold to them the said James Haslet
James Harbroe and Henry Harland In Trust

#2
their wilful Omission Neglect or Default but
each of them for his Own […ots?] Deeds Neglect and
Receipts Only and Further that my said

Thanks,
Alexander

3303
Free Photo Restoration & Date Old Photographs / Re: A little clean please...
« on: Tuesday 07 July 09 20:01 BST (UK)  »
 :) Thank you all very much for your work! :)

Alexander

Pages: 1 ... 364 365 366 [367] 368 369 370 ... 372