I thought I'd share this with you as it has been a good lesson for me not to rely too heavily on the story revealed by the census and have a bit more faith in family stories.
When I started researching my tree last summer, the family history suggested that there were romany links, with tales of a travelling fair and a traditional gypsy funeral. I found no evidence of this at all in the censuses back to 1841, although the family were scavengers, dustmen and costermongers. They moved a lot-but all within the couple of square miles of Camberwell Green to the Old Kent road, so I put the stories aside as a bit of romanticism
But-Since using Genes Reunited in November, I've linked up with researchers in two branches of the tree-and both had family stories of gypsy links. One has now discovered living rellies in her part of the tree-still travelling and living in caravans in Kent
So perhaps my family were wayfarers after all and came back into town for the winter months . Maybe that explained why they lived in the same streets at multiple addresses (as well as not making the rent). The 1851 census onwards might have caught them whilst they were still in town and so presents a picture of a settled family. No way of proving it of course-but there is an interesting chapter on the mass exodus of workers in The Victorian City edited by Dyos
Monique