Thanks for that Di. I have just noticed an error on my tree, I give the births of both John and his wife Elizabeth as 1811. This is extremely unlikely as their oldest child Lydia was b 1822, however I think the children of her brother John, do look the most likely
as their known children had the following names and dobs, Lydia, b1822, Elizabeth b1826, Sarah my 2XGGM(1829-1906) and her sister Mary also b1829, I don't know whether they were twins, or Jan and Dec births etc.then a gap to the only son William b1836, and his sister Jane b1839, so it seems possible that my John was possibly the son, or more likely the grandson of Adams Moule. On checking his record I do find that I have some census information which may account for the age error. I have 1841 census where the ages were rounded, so John and Elizabeth could have been born as early as 1806, which, while young is possible.The 1841 census shows |Osborn Terrace St, Andrew the Great, Cambridge, and his occupation is given as Maltster in 1847 at the marriage of Mary. Hope that helps.Don't see any ready connection but my ancestor, Sarah, married a William Brignell and their occupation was painters and decorators. Later the family formed a business, which still functions in Cambridge I believe.
