Hi Carol
OOPS
Sorry there was nothing in the will, If you want to part with the will or a copy I would be only to pleased to buy it from you, it all helps with my Macclesfield research.
Looking through the 1851 census there are a lot of Wardle families who could have had a Henry who died at some time prior to cival registration commencing in 1837,and possibly fathered Thomas, although the referance to silk manufacturer is puzzleing. There were many one man operations that worked from home in the early years of silk weaving,a lot would elevate themselvse to manufacturer on census record etc. There are so many possibilities,I will have to find time to search the 1841 and see what can be gleemed from it.
With regards to Martha working for her father, I would say not, I think her and her husband would be working for themselves, proberbly being commisioned by the larger manufacturer, in the area of town where they lived was a conclomeration of self employed weavers working from garrat rooms or small weaving sheds, as for the undertaker, it seems at that time this occupation was a sideline for many people,I have seen a blacksmith & undertaker. It also would fit in well with the weaving of silk because of the connection with the making of shrouds and silk coffin linnings etc.
bye for now
peterbennett
ErrorSPAM
REPORT THIS POST AS SPAM (Use 'Report to Moderator'). DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS IN THIS POST. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS PERSON.
][/color]
ErrorSPAM
REPORT THIS POST AS SPAM (Use 'Report to Moderator'). DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS IN THIS POST. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS PERSON.
][/color]
ErrorSPAM
REPORT THIS POST AS SPAM (Use 'Report to Moderator'). DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS IN THIS POST. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS PERSON.
][/color]