My biggest mystery will not be published until after the death of the individual concerned but, amonst others, I have these.
My family lived and farmed for many years at Napchester, near Whitfield, in the parish of Northbourne, Kent. Since they were much closer to Whitfield church than Northbourne, all of their christenings, etc., took place there. However, I could not find the baptism of one of my ancestors in the 1600s. I had his siblings, and he was mentioned in the will of his father, all at Whitfield/Napchester.
I worked my way out, eventually finding a baptism that would fit in Barham, a few miles up the road. There were no other baptisms for 50 years either way to indicate another family of the same name, so I was more or less forced to accept him as mine.
But I couldn't find his parents' marriage either, until someone pointed me to St Margaret's at Cliffe, a few miles in the opposite direction!
I couldn't work out why the first child would be baptised at Barham, but someone suggested that the first child was often baptised in the in-laws' parish. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the mother's baptism at either St Margaret's or Barham! So why were they married in St Margaret's? Was she in service? Where did she come from? Why was the firstborn baptised in Barham?
I have included them in my history, with a note of caution, but I'm pretty certain I have the right father from the will of 1721, which takes me neatly back to my earliest known ancestor who died in 1622 - he has been my ultimate brick wall for several years now!
I have another ancestor in the same line - slightly later, who also married away from home. Both parties lived in Alkham and he had lands in Northbourne, but their marriage took place at Acrise!! Again, only a few miles up the road, but why??
Regards, Bill