And there's more.....
A distinct possibility - the only Edwin Bates in Croydon...
1901 Croydon, SurreyRG 13/642 folio 129 pp31-32
111 Dennett Road
Thomas W Bates, head, married, 53, asphalter (own account), Hastings Sussex
Alice [Bates], boarder [sic], single, 34, Deptford Kent
Alice do., daur, 14, Croydon Surrey
Ethel do., daur, 12, Croydon Surrey
William do., son, 10, Croydon Surrey
James, do., son, 8, Croydon Surrey
Alfred, do., son, 6, Croydon Surrey
Henry do., son, 4, Croydon Surrey
Edwin do., son, 2, Croydon Surrey
Why was Alice described as a "boarder" and single?
[Because they weren't actually married...see below]
The 1891 Census makes interesting reading...
1891 Croydon, SurreyRG 12/589 folios 137 (p8) & 138 (p9)
111 Dennett Road
Thomas W Bates, head, married, 44, fencing and tar[r]ing labour, Hastings Sussex
Alice do., wife, married, 26, Deptford Kent
Rebecca do., daur, 16, Croydon Surrey
Alice H. do, daur, 6, Croydon Surrey
Ethel do., daur, 3, Croydon Surrey
William R. do., son, 5mo, Croydon Surrey
Arthur Giles, boarder, widower, 59, ground labourer, Croydon Surrey
So does the 1881 Census...
1881 Croydon, SurreyRG 11/810 folio 23 page 55
Laurel Cottage (next to 5 Coleshill Terrace)
Thomas W Bates, head, marr, 34, contractor, Hastings Sussex
Rebecca do., mar, 27, Crowboro SussexThomas W. do., son, 12, scholar, Croydon Surrey
Arthur J. do., son, 10, scholar, Croydon Surrey
Lucy do., daur, 7, scholar, Croydon Surrey
Rebecca do., daur, 4, Croydon Surrey
Alice Lake, visitor, 16, general servant, Deptford KentEmily Morley, servant, 14, general servant, Chelsham Surrey
And finally, note the year!
Marriage registration:
Thomas William Bates
Dec qtr 1902, Greenwich vol 1d p 1758
Matching reference:
Alice Lake