Author Topic: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?  (Read 5672 times)

Offline jannorth

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« on: Sunday 06 January 08 21:39 GMT (UK) »
I am looking for information as to the rehousing of families that lived on Flask Lane @ 1860.  From what I can find out the lane was leveled forthe expansion of Victoria station.  Was there something else that happened to Flask Lane first ie flood that destroyed all the houses or were they repossessed for the expansion and if so are there records of where the families were rehoused?  My distant relatives were at number 13 Flask Lane in 1851 census.
Prater, North and Cochrane in the Kent, Middlesex and London area. 
Wood, Inglis and Dougald in the Aryshire and Lanarkshire area.

Offline Meliora

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,012
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #1 on: Monday 07 January 08 16:09 GMT (UK) »
Have you got your family in the 1861 census ?  This might give you an idea of where they went.

Meliora
RIP 1927-2018

This information is Crown Copyright from National Archives.gov.uk

Offline jannorth

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #2 on: Monday 07 January 08 16:36 GMT (UK) »
I have tried both the 1861 and 1871 Census with no success.  Just hoping that someone may have some other line of research
Prater, North and Cochrane in the Kent, Middlesex and London area. 
Wood, Inglis and Dougald in the Aryshire and Lanarkshire area.

Online Barbara F

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,741
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #3 on: Monday 07 January 08 16:41 GMT (UK) »
Hello

The Wesminster Archives have this on their web site http://www.westminster.gov.uk/archives/

"The 1841 census for Paddington and the 1861 census for the Pimlico and Belgravia areas of Westminster have not survived"

Helps to explain why you cannot find the family in 1861.

Barbara  :)

Joy, Larkin, Twort, Baker, Whibley - Brenchley and Horsmonden area Kent
Fewell and Speller - Essex and London
Headington and Bateman - London
Feltwell - Norfolk and London
Lewin - India and NZ
Evan-Thomas - Wales and London
Purser and Cook - Hunts

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline jannorth

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #4 on: Monday 07 January 08 22:04 GMT (UK) »
Barbara,

Many thanks for that I was begining to think they had left the country! 
Prater, North and Cochrane in the Kent, Middlesex and London area. 
Wood, Inglis and Dougald in the Aryshire and Lanarkshire area.

Offline meles

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,472
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 10 January 08 19:16 GMT (UK) »
My family were in Pimlico in 1861 and I spent ages trying to find them. Then I discovered that the records were destroyed. Very frustrating, but at least it's a mystery solved.

meles
Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk<br />Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk<br />Harrison: London; Pollock<br />Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx<br />Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk<br />Rogers: London; Bartlett: London<br />Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants<br />Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Barbara F

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,741
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 10 January 08 20:21 GMT (UK) »
I agree meles - at least you can stop looking!
But why are my relatives always in the missing bits? Part of Paddington in 1841, other parts of London in 1861 and a whole Registration District in Essex (Dunmow) in 1851  >:(
Barbara
Joy, Larkin, Twort, Baker, Whibley - Brenchley and Horsmonden area Kent
Fewell and Speller - Essex and London
Headington and Bateman - London
Feltwell - Norfolk and London
Lewin - India and NZ
Evan-Thomas - Wales and London
Purser and Cook - Hunts

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline jannorth

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #7 on: Friday 11 January 08 14:08 GMT (UK) »
Barbara and Meles,

So what are your plans now?  I guess the only option is visiting what remains of the local churches etc to see what records remain.  Are you both in the UK? 
Prater, North and Cochrane in the Kent, Middlesex and London area. 
Wood, Inglis and Dougald in the Aryshire and Lanarkshire area.

Offline meles

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,472
    • View Profile
Re: Flask Lane, Pimlico flattened for Victoria Station?
« Reply #8 on: Friday 11 January 08 14:18 GMT (UK) »
For me, it's not the end of the world. It's only one census record missing. And I do have birth certificates from this period, so I do know where they were and don't really need to go to local churches.

meles

PS I live in London
Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk<br />Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk<br />Harrison: London; Pollock<br />Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx<br />Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk<br />Rogers: London; Bartlett: London<br />Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants<br />Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk