William HALE born 1796

[bhunter]

I am looking for William HALE and his wife Judith born 1796ish in Hertfordshire.
Their daughter Elizabeth HALE christened 8 July 1832 Reed, Hertfordshire married Patrick CONNOR at St Andrews, Union Road, Cambridge on 16 Apr 1855.

William's occupation as per the daughter's marriage certificate is husbandman.

Thanks

[Pels.]

Hi bhunter,

Was it the census information you were looking for .. I can see both William and Judith in 1841 .. with Elizabeth as a nine year old .. ?

Kind regards,

Pels.

[Pels.]

I'll post the details anyway .. ! 

1841 census:
HO107/446/10, Folio 7, Page 8

Hertfordshire, Reed

Will Hale, 50, Ag Lab
Judith, 45
George, 20, Ag Lab
James, 15, Ag Lab
Mary, 12
Elizabeth, 9
Hester, 7

All born in county.

Interestingly enough, further down the same page .. there might be a connection .. ?

William Hale, 70, Pauper Ag Lab
Jane, 70
Joseph, 40, Ag Lab
John, 10

All born in county,
   

[bhunter]

Census information would be excellent.  
I don't know how to go about finding marriage info for Judith and William as they are not on LDS.
Thanks

[Pels.]

I can't help you with their marriage I'm afraid .. hopefully someone else can help you with that .. ?

But here is Judith in 1851 ..

1851 census:
HO107/1707, Folio 294, Page 13

Hertfordshire, Reed

George Hall, h, mar, 32, Ag Lab, b. Reed
Lucy, wife, 31, Lab wife, b. Chipping
John, son, 4, b. Reed
Judith, mother, wid, 59, Pauper, b. Reed

[Pels.]

The last one for Judith .. 


1861 census:
RG9/813, Folio 66, Page 9

Hertfordshire, Reed
Street.

Judy Hale, h. wid, 70, Pauper Ag Lab Widow, b. Reed


Death, Dec qtr, 1862
Judith Hale          
Royston, Vol 3a, page 167

[Lady Di]

Herts marriage index has the following record:

Banns for - William Hale & Judith Martin of Reed at Buckland on 1 Jun 1811.

If William was born 1796ish this may not be his marriage as he would have been abt 15 at the time. Maybe he was older than first thought   


Di

[Pels.]

This made me look twice Di .. if the census details in 1841 were rounded down to such a degree .. and William was in fact 54 and Judith 49 this would slot her age in nicely with the later returns.

Meaning Judith could have been approx 1792 and William as early as 1787.

So therefore William may have been 24 when they married, is this making any sense .. ?

[bhunter]

Thanks very much to everyone