« Reply #18 on: Thursday 12 November 09 13:52 GMT (UK) »
there is a problem with Timothy being the Father of John and Thomas and whoever else we have not yet discovered. Because we we thought there were only 3 in a family there were 4 others but two passed as infants. So Im expectng to find that John and Thomas have other siblings. Now it is really strange, Timothy must have done something really bad but not one descendant down to 5 generations even uses Timothy as a name of one of their children. John has 8 or nine, Thomas has 7, his thomas has 3 by first marriage and 13 by second marriage., our James
has several by first marriage, and one by second, If he has done that then that would be the excuse or timothy is not their father.
I found a Marriage of a Timothy in st swithuns, worcester for a Mary and two children John and Thomas. but I had the conception that Thomas was older. But I dont have a birthdate for him, just a guess. He is married in 1834 and Thomas in 1840 so he could be five years older so born about 1812 according to the 1851 british census if it is correct.
Meredith, Wales, Lancashire, Staffordshire, Cheshire, New Jersey, Pacific
Coe, New York, San Franscisco, Connecticut
Schaumkel, Germany
Wulf, Germany, Wayne Michigan, Schleswig-Holstein
Halbert, New Castle on Tyne
Milligan, Kirkcudbright, Lancashire, US
Hornel, Kirkcudbright, US
Keelan, Ireland,
Fleugge, Flugge, Germany, US
Obrist, Switzerland, NZ, US
Forrest, Macclesfield, New Jersey, New York, Passaic
Brereton, Wales, New Jersey
Nightingale, Leek, Passaic
Jardine, Hunterdon