Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Back of Coat of Arms - COMPLETED  (Read 2479 times)

Offline ainslie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,768
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Back of Coat of Arms
« Reply #9 on: Monday 08 February 10 08:49 GMT (UK) »
'Fancy frame'?

Offline robbo43

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 945
  • Kathie 1932 - 2010
    • View Profile
Re: Back of Coat of Arms
« Reply #10 on: Monday 08 February 10 15:34 GMT (UK) »
I reckon it is

Fancy  ?????
to suit picture
dim[ensions] 9 x 7

Can't make out the second word, the descenders don't seem to me to fit "frame"

The fainter writing beneath this could interesting but I can't make out anything.

Robert
FLOOD - Exeter, Middlesex.  DAVEY - Norfolk, Herts, West Ham.  MILLS - Hampshire.  GARLAND - Sussex.  BRIGHT - Hampshire, GULLIVER - Hampshire, Sussex, London.  NOCKELS - Norfolk.  POMEROY - Exeter.  RANDALL - Sussex, Surrey.  REYNOLDS - Cambridgeshire.  BOWYER - Cambridgeshire & Suffolk.  STUPPELL - Kent.  MISSEN - Cambridgeshire.  TAYLOR - Cambridgeshire.  TOWNSEND - London.  CURTIN - London, GIBBONS - Suffolk, BROWN - Suffolk, SWALE(S) - Yorkshire, GAIN - Sussex

Offline grantleydawn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,792
  • My collateral ancestors
    • View Profile
Re: Back of Coat of Arms
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 09 February 10 08:37 GMT (UK) »
It seems definite that the 9 & 7 would be 9 inches x 7 inches (including the frame).
The backing card of the image is 7.9 inches x 6 inches.

Thankyou for everyone's input.

regards
Grantley

Offline grantleydawn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,792
  • My collateral ancestors
    • View Profile
Re: Back of Coat of Arms - COMPLETED
« Reply #12 on: Friday 12 March 10 06:06 GMT (UK) »
I took it to a picture framer and he said, without hestition, "Fancy opening to suit picture".

I can now see "Fancy opng".

Regards
Grantley
Pages: 1 [2]