Toys/Tighes

[meara]

Any info on John 1833-  and  Maryjane ne.Mullen 1836- Toy/Tighe who left Glasgow for South America after 1881 with children Susan,Anne,Maggie,Patrick andElizabeth? Might have been to Chile.

[helvissa]

I take it they're on the 1881 census and then vanish after that?

[meara]

Yes.Can't find any online records for Chile,assuming thats where they ended up.Am I on the right board?

[helvissa]

I spose it depends if you feel you're a beginner or not!

There's migration records on Find My Past:
http://www.findmypast.co.uk/

I had a look but couldn't really find anything (you can search for free but you have to pay to see transcriptions or scans of the original document).

I've checked John Toy and John Tighe on the UK incoming passanegers database and got nothing, I'm afraid (just in case they came back!).

[meara]

Thanks.I believe Maryanne did go back once,I'll have a look on findmypast.

[helvissa]

Looked for Mary Toy, Mary Tighe, Maryanne Toy, Mary Anne Toy, Maryanne Tighe, Mary Anne Tighe, with the date of birth plus or minus 1836 and couldn't find anything. This was on incoming passengers, which is on Ancestry. 

[meara]

Thanks again.What I need is a south american connection, pity there was only one son.Maybe the name just died out.

[Daisypetal]

Hi,

Could this be a grandchild, Maggie's daughter?


Colen Campbell Grant Tighe b 27 NOV 1898   Ercilla, Ix-Region, Chile
Parents:  Campbell Grant  and Maggien Tighe     

married Rosa Adela Fellay  1922 Chile
died cir 1972

It is a member submitted entry on the IGI so should be checked if possible.


I also found this on the Ancestral file, possibly your Patrick or a relation?

Patricio TIGHE b cir 1879 Ireland married Annie Scott

Information removed due to copyright violation. See http://www.rootschat.com/forum/copyright.php for more details

RootsChat must deal with any breach of copyright by its members.

For some time the team of Copyright Editors has been removing breaches of copyright and sending detailed personal messages to the member that had posted the information.  Due to the volume of posts and members this is now impractical.  Messages in breach will simply be deleted and this notice posted.  We apologise for any inconvenience caused but are sure you will appreciate the importance of this issue.


If this is your family on the 1871 and 1881 census then it looks like there is more than one son. I can't see the imagse to check, maybe someone else will be able to take a look,
 

1871  Old Monkland, Lanarkshire
Waddells Land

LOY 
John      Head    38    Surface Man               Ireland
Mary      Wife    35                                    Ireland
Thomas   Son    16    Labourer Bil Work         Ireland
Wm        Son    14    Labourer On Pit Head    Ayrshire
John       Son    12    Labourer In Pit            Argyllshire
Mary      Daur    10    Scholar                      Argyllshire
Susan    Daur     7    Scholar                      Argyllshire
Ann       Daur     3                                    Argyllshire
Margaret  Daur    10 Mo                           Old Monk, Lanark



1881  New Monkland,  Lanarkshire
9 Waddell'S Place

TOY
John        Head    48    General Laborer       Ireland
Margaret  Wife     44                                Ireland
John         Son    22    Black Smith              Invenhillen, Argyleshire
Annie       Daur    13                                        "
Maggie     Daur    11    Scholar                    Whifflet, Lanarkshire
Patrick       Son     7    Scholar                         "
Elizabeth   Daur     5    Scholar                          " 
Susan       Daur    16    Domestic Servant     Invenhillen, Argyleshire


Looking on the IGI I think Invenhillen is supposed to be Inverchaolain.


Regards
Daisy
 

[Daisypetal]

Hi Copright editor,

Please can you tell me why you have removed the incoming passenger information?  I transcribed the information myself from the image.

The information source quotes,

'Data imaged from the National Archives, London, England. The National Archives gives no warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or fitness for the purpose of the information provided. Images may be used only for purposes of research, private study or education. Applications for any other use should be made to the National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU.'

Not being completely sure about copyright of trancriptions of images I called the National Archives and explained he situation that I had transcribed an image of a passenger list to a message board to help a fellow researcher, not for a fee etc. and they told me 'If transcribing from a NA document there is no copyright violation and no fee, unless I was reproducing the actual image.'

So I'm not sure what copyright violation you think I have made


Regards,
Daisy