Author Topic: Lacock Marriage 1787 - BUTCHER and GINGELL  (Read 2202 times)

Offline DRH123

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Lacock Marriage 1787 - BUTCHER and GINGELL
« on: Thursday 08 September 11 15:52 BST (UK) »
Please can anyone confirm this marriage, which I only have from a member submission to the IGI?

Thomas BUTCHER and Elizabeth GINGELL  at Lacock, 27 Dec 1787.

There are at least three candidates for Elizabeth, born in the area at a suitable time, so any further details, especially the witnesses, could be useful.

Thank you for looking

David


Offline gingealogy

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lacock Marriage 1787 - BUTCHER and GINGELL
« Reply #1 on: Friday 09 September 11 10:07 BST (UK) »
Hello David,

I have this couple on my Gingell family tree. The information was provided by Brian Butcher, the GtGtGtGrandson of Thomas Butcher and Eliza Gingell. It reads :

Thomas Butcher married Eliza Gingell at St Cyriac's, Lacock, Wiltshire, England on 27th December 1787. Married by licence. Both stated as Local. Bondsman Samuel Barnes a Lacock shopkeeper. Witnesses Emanuel Barnes and Henry Tayler. They had nine daughters and four sons. They lived at nearby Bowden Hill.

This information comes from my website at :

http://www.gingell.com/familytree/?indi=07795

(You can contact Brian using the link above)

Kind regards

Craig
http://www.gingell.com
Gingell - all variations thereof

Offline DRH123

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: Lacock Marriage 1787 - BUTCHER and GINGELL
« Reply #2 on: Friday 09 September 11 11:56 BST (UK) »
Wow, what a lot of Gingells!

Thank you for the info, Craig, and thank you for your wonderful Gingell site.

The couple from Lacock are ancestors of a friend of mine. Remarkably, I've found her husband has Gingell ancestors as well. He is descended from a George Gingell of Hullavington, born in Stanton St. Quintin to John and Susannah in 1784. I've found three possibilities for the Eliza(beth) who married Thomas Butcher, two from Christian Malford and one the daughter of the same John and Susannah! So possibly my friends are related to each other apart from being married - fifth cousins if I've counted right.  You have George and some of his children on your site but not his parents. I'll send you the details when I've got them sorted out.

One last question - which I'm sure you've met many times - how do you pronounce Gingell?

David

Offline gingealogy

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lacock Marriage 1787 - BUTCHER and GINGELL
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 14 September 11 17:25 BST (UK) »
Hello David,

I just updated the tree for Eliza and Thomas to include their children -

http://www.gingell.com/familytree/?tree=07795

If there is any further information you would like to add, please let me know. You can write to me direct at the page below -

http://www.gingell.com/familytree/?email=00001

Pronunciation is always a contentious topic. I've met several members or my not so immediate Gingell family and there have been several variations -

1. Guin (as in Guiness) jell (as in hair gel)
2. Guin (as in Guiness) jewel (as in jewellery)
3. Guin (as in Guiness) goul (as in goulash)
4. Gin (as in Gin and Tonic) jell (as in hair gel)
5. Gin (as in Gin and Tonic) jewel (as in jewellery)
6. Gin (as in Gin and Tonic) goul (as in goulash)

Personally, I favour the way my grandmother used to say it, Guin (as in Guiness) jell (as in hair gel).

Kind regards

Craig
http://www.gingell.com
Gingell - all variations thereof