ok Carol, I have him in my tree notes....I have a "work in progress tree" so I do not have a baptism for him though. The East Markham baptisms are not complete.As you know. I will let you into the way my mind works, a scary thing according to my husband!!
I will try and explain why Luke is attached to my tree where I have put him...
Robert A and Alice had 4 sons
Edward baptised 30 Sep 1611
Robert bapt 23 Jan 1614 buried 11 Feb 1614
Thomas bap 23 Apr 1615 buried 5 Feb 1668
Ellis bap 30 Nov 1618 buried 11 Aug 1679 in Edwinstowe.
Edward vanishes, although there is a possible marriage in the next village of Askham for an Edward who is of an age to be a son of this Edward.
Ellis is paying the hearth tax in Edwinstowe 1664/1674 and his 9 children are all baptised there, apart from the eldest who is born in Newark because of the "warr" this is in the Edwinstowe register.
Thomas is in East Markham, he took the protestation oath in 1641/2 and was a resident.
He married Kathrine Carr in EM 14 Jan 1640/1 and had 4 sons.
Thomas bapt 28 Oct 1641.
Francis born and died 1642
John bapt 28 apr 1645 buried Laneham 26 Jun 1711, he was paying hearth tax in Laneham in 1689, and all his 7 children were baptised there.(Mine)
Peter bapt 21 Feb 1646/7 vanished...
John is my 7x great. 7 children baptised No Luke.
Thomas married 30 Jul 1664 in East Retford to Elizabeth Stanniland, I have 3 sons for them.
Thomas was on the hearth tax 1664/1674.
Luke born C 1661
Francis BC 1663
Henry baptised 15 Jan 1665 EM.
Now this Thomas and his 3 sons were the only An(t)(c)liff(e) family in East Markham at this time. descended through Robert.
Mine had moved on to Laneham, although they do come back here later on.
I then have Luke married to Elinor Jackson 22 Nov 1683.
Just to complicate things little
Robert had a brother Luke born C 1590 and buried 14 May 1659, this Luke married Mary Moss in EM 5 Oct 1617 and they had 4 sons and 1 daughter.
One son was yet another Luke baptised 8 May 1625......I have not followed him at all, but he is a little old to be the Luke marrying in 1683.But he could have been the father of another Luke who did marry then.
If you can make head or tail of this do get back to me...