Hi again
This is from the article that Nick posted:
Catherine Munro, daughter of the deceased Ann Chisbolm, sister of the deceased debtor, who was married to Roderick Munro, Innkeeper, Evanton, Ross-shire, wife of Alexander Munro, of 48, Campden Street, Campden Hill, Kensington, London, or elsewhere furth of Scotland ; the said Alexander Munro for himself and his interest; Isabella Murdoch, residing at Pentridge, near Melbourne, Australia, only child of the late Mary Munro or Murdoch, (daughter of the said Catherine Munro), sometime, and last while in Scotland, resident at Evanton aforesaid, wife of James Murdoch, who resides at Pentridge aforesaid j the said James Murdoch for himself and for his interest, and Administrator for his said child ;This is how I understand it:
Ann Chisholm was married to Roderick Munro. Catherine Munro, their daughter, was married to Alexander Munro (London).
Catherine Munro had a daughter, Mary Munro ( her illegitimate dau, who can be found on 1841 census with Donald, the deceased in article) who married James Murdoch ...they had Isabella.
Did Mary Monro take on the Murdoch name? But Mary Monro (who married J Murdoch) is the illegit d/o Catherine and not Roderick MUNRO and Ann KEEPER.
so Ann Chisholm= Roderick Munro
they have Catherine Munro
she has Illegit dau, Mary Munro
Catherine Munro = Alexander Munro in London
Mary Munro (d/o Catherine) = James Murdoch
they have Isabella Murdoch
Am I confused?
deb