Author Topic: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880  (Read 6240 times)

Offline ~MERLIN~

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,321
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 01:22 BST (UK) »
Judith it's just a typical ANCESTRY error... one of the many thousands  ::)

EVANS Eileen Esther b. 1888 ESSENDON #2758
Father: William
Mother: Margaret HEALEY

Offline ~MERLIN~

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,321
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 01:30 BST (UK) »
Can you transcribe the full details from BOTH her marriage certificates please?

Offline Neil Todd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,393
  • "Oportet vivere"
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 01:34 BST (UK) »
 ;D ;D ;D Quote. ANCESTRY error... one of the many thousands

Love it. Birth Possibly 1880 do you think ::)

Neil 8)
Grewl,Nickerseens,flombastion,Everheads


Offline judb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,709
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 01:35 BST (UK) »
Thanks, Merlin.  Ancestry is certainly a nuisance at times.  Good to eliminate this girl anyway.  :)

Judith
DYER - Wilts, London, Somerset, MIDLANE - Hants, Wilts, SONE - Hants, WRIGHT - London, Hants, SEAGER - Deptford, DWYER, FERGUSON - Victoria, MASON - Woodford Vic, BALLARD - South Wales, GOULDBY - Lowestoft
"Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future..." T S Eliot

UK Census information Crown Copyrightt, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ~MERLIN~

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,321
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 02:19 BST (UK) »
Thanks, Merlin.  Ancestry is certainly a nuisance at times.  Good to eliminate this girl anyway.  :)

The parents to that birth were married in 1886 & there's another six births registered to them, so not the lady in question.

Can you see Elspeth & Margaret on any of the original census for 1901 & 1911?

Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,660
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 02:23 BST (UK) »
1901 UK census
Holland Road, Lambeth
Class: RG13; Piece: 419; Folio: 144; Page: 10

Margaret EVANS, Head, widow, 43, Private Means, born Tasmania, Australia
Elsie EVANS, Daur, single, 21, Music Hall Artist Actor, born Melbourne, Australia
Olga (no surname, no ditto), Daur, single, 3, born Petersberg, Russia

Technically, Olga should be Margaret's daughter, but many often didn't give info in relation to the head of the family as they were supposed to.

Debra  :)

Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,660
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 02:29 BST (UK) »
In 1911 Elsie is living with her husband Ashley CHANDLER in Sussex, no children born alive, still living or deceased.

Debra  :)

Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,660
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 03:01 BST (UK) »
 ??? ???

NSW Marriage

1722/1875
EVANS, WILLIAM L L
MORSE, MARGARET H
Registered at ALBURY

Death in Victoria
1892


Wm L L EVANS
Died: Tungamah, Victoria
Age:    43
# 4395

Debra  :)

Offline sparrett

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,989
    • View Profile
Re: William Louis Leslie EVANS of Melbourne, c 1880
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday 06 August 13 09:17 BST (UK) »
I suppose it is possible that the OLGA on the census whose relationship to the others is not quite defined, may be the daughter of ELSIE rather than MARGARET.

Margaret, if born in 1853 is not too old, of course to be a mother, but.......?
And she had been widowed a while if the death found by Debra is correct

Sue
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk