Hi YO8
Thanks for your post, but your use of the word 'pauper' is a little unfortunate.
The council would refer to these areas as being 'common' graves. Most of the people in these sections had their actual funerals paid for, but could not afford the expense of the 'exclusive' rights to a burial plot the family had paid for. As these are not 'exclusive' plots and usually conatin many unrelated people, headstones generally aren't erected. Even older cemeteries have common plots that contain only the remains of babies and children.
At that time, a lot of hospitals took care of the funeral arrangements with little or no regard to the feeling of the parents. This was the morality of the time and things have, thankfully, moved on. As society has come to learn, parents need to have closure as to where children are buried, now they are allowed to spend quiet time with their deceased children and take photos of them.
It is a popular and perpetuated myth that all babies were buried in coffins of adults and that their burial records can't be found. Maybe that was the situation historically and by that I mean pre 20th century but by the late 1960's, I would be very surprised if that was ever the case. The British Undertakers Association started campaigning in 1898 for a change to the death registration of still-born children but the government took until 1927 to change the registration laws. There was strong public opposition to the burial of still-born and new-born children in strangers coffins.
It's a difficult subject to deal with, and the op has discovered that at least one of her local cemeteries has been helpful.
Dawn