Mold Parish Records Lookup (please!!)

[Deirdre784]

Do you know when he was born? Just there are 2 other Edward Simon marriages in North Wales.... found these this morning but forgot to add them.
 
Ruthin, 23 May 1784 to Elizabeth Thomas. Both signed x.
Chirk, 20 April 1798 to Mary Winter (this Edward was also a widower). But this Edward and Mary both signed their names.

Deirdre

[Deirdre784]

Later baptisms at Mold to John and Mary Williams (is this farmer another couple?):

Joseph, 22 Oct 1820, John a labourer, abode Argoed
Margaret, 12 Feb 1821, John a farmer, abode Hendrebiffa?
Mary, 12 Feb 1821, John a farmer, abode Hendrebiffa?
Hannah, 21 April 1821, John a labourer, abode Mold
Anne, 4 Oct 1823, John a laborer, abode Mold
Mary, 29 Jan 1824, John a labourer, abode Argoed
Harriet, 23 Mar 1825, John a labourer, abode Mold

Deirdre

[despair]

If you search the 1841 census for John Williams(1785+/- 10),with a Mary(counting only wives) in "Mold" there are 5 couples who probably cover the baptisms you have found-

2 in Argoed(one a labourer,one a joiner)
1 in Hendrebiffa(a farmer)
2iin Mold(both labourers)

I have a note of the census refs if any particular one is of interest.

Regards
Roger

[Deirdre784]

Hi Roger, that makes sense - I wonder where the hairdresser fits in - but probably means that we don't have the right sisters Elizabeth and Sarah...

[despair]

I thought that they were correct because Thomas Forsyth,aged 6 is with John,Mary and Sarah,in Mold in 1841,or have I misunderstood?

Regards
Roger

[Deirdre784]

Hi Roger,

John was a labourer from Mold for the Elizabeth baptism I found in 1813 but a joiner from Argoed for the Sarah I found in 1825. As there were 2 labourers from Mold and a joiner from Argoed in the 1841 census I assumed this suggested they were different families . 

If Sarah is right (ie as with Thomas Forsyth in 1841) then the Elizabeth is likely to be wrong.

Deirdre

[Gadget]

I thought that they were correct because Thomas Forsyth,aged 6 is with John,Mary and Sarah,in Mold in 1841,or have I misunderstood?

Regards
Roger

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=673251.msg5183861#msg5183861


I'd say that the Sarah bpt is not the correct one.

[Deirdre784]

I'd say that the Sarah bpt is not the correct one.

Me too, having re-read the whole topic.... 

[despair]

Apologies-I thought you were questioning whether the correct Sarah had been identified rather than the correct baptism for that Sarah.

Regards
Roger