Author Topic: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891  (Read 2048 times)

Offline heatherjulie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,229
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 03 July 14 10:29 BST (UK) »
John is not down as grandson but as there is a gap of 13 years between him and William I just wondered. Unmarried Amelia stays with her parents and John.

We can't post 1911 details on the board.

Heather

post corrected

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline tenby tart

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 03 July 14 13:03 BST (UK) »
Thank you so much Heather  :)
Lynne
Weare Monmouthshire
Bossolo Besselo Italy
Watkins Risca Monmouthshire
Perry Birmingham

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,553
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 03 July 14 18:13 BST (UK) »
marriage
Marriage: 12 Jul 1869 St Mary, Walton on the Hill, Lancashire, England
John Lea - full age, Joiner, Bachelor, Kirkdale
Elizabeth Ann Johns - (X), full age, Spinster, Kirkdale
    Groom's Father: William Lea, Labourer
    Bride's Father: Joseph Johns, Mariner
    Witness: William Sutton; Jessie Cochrane

don`t think John Lea was Amelias child ...look at this baptism record

Baptism: 28 Jul 1889 St Mary, Walton on the Hill, Lancashire, England
John Lea - [Child] of John Lea & Elizabeth Ann
    Born: 16 Jun 1889
    Abode: 46 Chirkdale St
    Occupation: Joiner
    Baptised by: T. J. Pritchard
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Offline tenby tart

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #12 on: Friday 04 July 14 08:48 BST (UK) »
Thank you so much I am doing this for a friend she is also my sons carer, my son is 33 and has learning difficulties, she is a wonderful woman and she will be so excited when she brings him home tonight and I can tell her all that has been found out about her ancestors.

Lynne  :)
Weare Monmouthshire
Bossolo Besselo Italy
Watkins Risca Monmouthshire
Perry Birmingham

Offline tenby tart

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #13 on: Friday 04 July 14 17:47 BST (UK) »
I have been looking for them for the last 2 hours in the 1871 census and I cant find them don't know where I'm going wrong can someone please see if they can find them

Thank you Lynne
Weare Monmouthshire
Bossolo Besselo Italy
Watkins Risca Monmouthshire
Perry Birmingham

Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,553
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #14 on: Friday 04 July 14 18:14 BST (UK) »
Have you looked under Lee as well as Lea ??
ADDED
well - here they are ...
John Lea aged 24
Elizabeth A Lea b Cornwall aged 25 ....
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/KD6M-6BP

but - who is Emma E Lea daughter aged 5 ...they married in 1869 - both Full Age ...so when Emma E Lea is born they are 18 /19 ...so it looks like one of them - couldn`t sign for the marriage because their parents wouldn`t allow it ....I will look for Emma`s baptism
added again ...Emma Elizabeth Lea is born dec qtr 1870 West Derby ,Liverpool - maybe this is her ...I wonder if that record should read 5 months and not 5 ??
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Offline heatherjulie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,229
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #15 on: Friday 04 July 14 20:45 BST (UK) »
1871
5 Ewbank? Street, Everton
John Lea  24 Ship Joiner
 Elizabeth L Sea  25
 Emma E Lea  5
46/135/3816/101/31

Try looking for John Sea

Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,553
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #16 on: Friday 04 July 14 21:02 BST (UK) »
1871
5 Ewbank? Street, Everton
John Lea  24 Ship Joiner
 Elizabeth L Sea  25
 Emma E Lea  5
46/135/3816/101/31

Try looking for John Sea
pretty certain this is them Heather - but Emma E Lea is 5 ....John and Elizabeth Ann married in 1869 ...I think that should read 5 months - and not 5 for Emma ...
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Offline heatherjulie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,229
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cant find this family in 1881 or 1891
« Reply #17 on: Friday 04 July 14 22:05 BST (UK) »
Like you, I think that it should be 5 months but just says 5 on the sheet. She was 10 in 1881 ;D