« Reply #6 on: Sunday 12 October 14 12:16 BST (UK) »
I am one of your 43 viewers who did not reply. Reason being that I had no idea what you were asking us as BB code meant nothing to me. Now that I understand your question, I agree that table functionality would be useful and have actually tried hitting the table button previously with a view to making my posts more easily readable. On seeing that it was coding rather than a blank table I decided not to bother. The current need to code the table means that it is highly unlikely that the average user will ever use it. Too complicated for those that are not computer savvy and too time consuming for those that are. Whilst I am capable of coding a table I have no desire to waste my little available time making my responses here look pretty. Time is better spent looking for answers for folks rather than presenting those answers in a table.
Crackett, Cracket, Webb, Turner, Henderson, Murray, Carr, Stavers, Thornton, Oliver, Davis, Hall, Anderson, Atknin, Austin, Bainbridge, Beach, Bullman, Charlton, Chator, Corbett, Corsall, Coxon, Davis, Dinnin, Dow, Farside, Fitton, Garden, Geddes, Gowans, Harmsworth, Hedderweek, Heron, Hedley, Hunter, Ironside, Jameson, Johnson, Laidler, Leck, Mason, Miller, Milne, Nesbitt, Newton, Parkinson, Piery, Prudow, Reay, Reed, Read, Reid, Robinson, Ruddiman, Smith, Tait, Thompson, Watson, Wilson, Youn
