Henry Barnard Dye married Louisa Marie Larkin (1871 – 1927) in 1897 (Yarmouth, Norfolk)
in the 1901 census of Great Yarmouth, Husband Henry is away. Household includes: Louisa (Head - aged 27; Henry aged 5; James aged 3; Emma aged 1; Henry Lerkings (Father of Louisa aged 71).
In the 1911 Census of Grimsby, Husband Henry is away again (at sea according to another census document). Household includes: Earia Dye (Head aged 46); Harry Dye aged 15; James Dye aged 13; Emma Dye aged 11; Elearia Dye (eleanor) aged 8; Jeanetta Dye aged 6; John Dye aged 4; Lawia Dye aged 2; Alice Farnham (A married 19 year old).
I don't yet know who Alice was, maybe just a lodger, it didnt state on the census.
Now the census entry was signed by the 15 year old son Harry Dye, he obviously had difficulties with spelling as the names should be: Earia Dye; Jeanetta Dye; Lawria Dye (Louisa Dye; Jeanette Dye; Laura Dye).
Harry listed Elearia Dye (eleanor), but the only birth I find that matches this person of the year given is a Helen Dye. He named himself Harry in the census but the birth index and the 1901 Census suggests he is actually Henry.
But one thing Harry did record in the 1911 Grimsby Census and is obviously deliberate is that his mother Louisa had 8 children, seven still alive, but one had died.
Given all children are a couple of years apart I can only assume this would have been Louisa's first child previous to Henry of 1895, but I cannot find any record of it.
It sounds a mess and I hope I got my queary across correctly, if not please ask and I will do my best to clarify.
Many thanks as always,
Dean.