Author Topic: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854  (Read 773 times)

Offline catfordcrooner

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« on: Tuesday 11 November 14 15:35 GMT (UK) »
Jane Louisa Peck married William Alfred Hayles in St. Olave, Bermondsey in 1875. They are my 2x Great Grandparents. I know from the marriage image that her father was Richard Peck, a carpenter, but that is all I know from that line of the family. Can anyone help please?
Crawford
Taylor
Hurstwaite
Hayles
Dunlop
Neil - Cork, Ireland

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,826
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 15:47 GMT (UK) »
Hi

Her address at marriage - 17 Nelson St, Bermondsey - may help in tracing the family.
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 15:52 GMT (UK) »
Have you found them in 1881 after the marriage, to establish her year and place of birth?


Ooh sorry, just seen in title she was bn 1854
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,826
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 15:54 GMT (UK) »
Birthplace per 1901 (dittoed from husband) is Southwark.

RG12/394/6/3.

In 1881 she is enumerated as Lucy Hayles, 27 b London: RG11/571/16/28.
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,132
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 15:58 GMT (UK) »
Could this be the family in 1861, transcribed as Pech apart from Jane?
RG 9; Piece: 270; Folio: 117; Page: 22
Whitechapel

Richard Pech   46  Labourer London Dock                         Croydon Surrey
Elizabeth Pech   34                                                           Bath
Richard Pech   14                                                           Spitalfields, Middlesex
Lancy Pech           11                                                            Spitalfields, Middlesex
James Pech   9                                                             Spitalfields, Middlesex
Jane Peck           7                                                              Bethnal Green, Middlesex
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline catfordcrooner

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 16:11 GMT (UK) »
I was wondering why I had Richard and Elizabeth with those birth dates on my tree - must have done that about 2 years ago.

I don't like the look of it though as Richard was a carpenter at the marriage
Crawford
Taylor
Hurstwaite
Hayles
Dunlop
Neil - Cork, Ireland

Offline catfordcrooner

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 16:15 GMT (UK) »
In the censuses after their marriage she is Eliza Jane, Lucy and Jane!
Crawford
Taylor
Hurstwaite
Hayles
Dunlop
Neil - Cork, Ireland

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,826
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 16:19 GMT (UK) »
In the censuses after their marriage she is Eliza Jane, Lucy and Jane!

Yes, and in 1871 she may be Jane Sarah Peck, 17 b London - in Bermondsey with widowed mother Elizabeth (49 b Bath) and brother James, 20 b London.

RG10/627/31/1.

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline rosie17

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,614
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Louisa Peck born c.1854
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday 11 November 14 16:24 GMT (UK) »
In the censuses after their marriage she is Eliza Jane, Lucy and Jane!

Yes, and in 1871 she may be Jane Sarah Peck, 17 b London - in Bermondsey with widowed mother Elizabeth (49 b Bath) and brother James, 20 b London.

RG10/627/31/1.
Yes I thought that looked like her also  ???