Couldn't be this gal could it?
Births Mar 1878
Landers Harriet Janet D Woolwich 1d 1133
1891;
RG12; Piece: 656; Folio: 28; Page: 14;
James J Landers 42
Harriet Landers 30
Harriet J Landers 14
John J Landers 12
Iryabel F Landers 9
Rose I Landers 7
Antony G Landers 3
Harriet N Landers 32
This one says she's born Plumstead.
The family in 1901 minus Harriet & James is now John
John J D Landers 52
Harriet Landers 41
John J D Landers 21
Alica J Landers 14
Anthony P Landers 12
William T Landers 9
Charles E Landers 7
Walter E Landers 4
Lizzie E Landers 2
RG13; Piece: 724; Folio: 23; Page: 4
Marriage;
John J D Landers Sept. 1877 Woolwich 1D 1393
On the same page is Harriet Newnham
Apart from the minor details of her name & DOB being wrong I think it could be her.
![Grin ;D](https://www.rootschat.com/forum/Smileys/classic/grin.gif)