I see that someone has a family tree which marries Mary Ann COOK/E to a Thomas WHARMBY in Manchester in 1883. You can see the church register here
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-12568-73225-61I was curious so I looked at the births for 1889 and found this:
Births December Quarter 1889
WHARMBY,
CLARA HULBERT
Registration District Chorlton, Lancashire
Volume 8c Page 857
From the immigration records for Victoria:
Ship
Orient arrived December 1889
M. A. WHARMBY, aged 29, married female
Clara, infant
Contracted to land at Sydney
A few lines below them is a Harry HULBERT, aged 18, single male (I wouldn't trust this age, they are often incorrect in immigration records)
From the immigration records for NSW:
Ship
Orient arrived December 1889
Hy HULBERT, Mechanic
Mrs WHARMBY, Wife
So they are in NSW, and there is this birth:
1892
#26046
WHARMBY,
GERTRUDE H
Mother: MARY A
Father: Not named
Registered at NEWTOWN
Then in WA this birth:
1895
WHARMBY,
NELLIEMother: MARY ANN WHARMBY
Father: Not named
Registered at PERTH
#1219
The only birth registered in WA as HOFFMAN:
1898
HOFFMAN,
PHOEBEFather: THOMAS
Mother: MARY ANN COOK
Registered at PERTH
#3596
So at some stage between 1895 and 1898, did Harry/Henry HULBERT decide he might like to be Thomas Hulbert HOFFMAN instead, or is he a different person?

The tree I mentioned above says that Mary Ann's husband Thomas WHARMBY died in 1884 (the year after they married), but if this is true then why didn't she marry Thomas? The plot thickens.

Debra
