Hi,
Yes that tree on Ancestry has the correct children.... as I said in my previous post, James Junior's wife went to New York on the "Albert Gallatin". Accompanying her were the rest of their children -
Charles 9, Noah 7, Elisa (Eliza) 5, George 4, Lewis (Levi) 2 and Frank 7 months. Another daughter, Marietta, was born in New York the following year. The family can be found on the 1860 US Federal census for Monroe, New York where James junior is a farmer. They are living next door to James' younger brother Thomas and his family
Getting back to the 1841 census for Burwell, I think that James "Deachrey" has to be my man. (Class: HO107; Piece: 73; Book: 2; Civil Parish: Burwell; County: Cambridgeshire; Enumeration District: 8; Folio: 9; Page: 13). Even though the ship manifest for the "New World" gives James' son James age as 11, I understand that ages can be incorrect. (James was born Newmarket, Sep quarter 1839, Vol 14, p106.)
I believe his father, James Peachey senior can be found a little further on in the same 1841 Census Burwell. (Class: HO107; Piece: 73; Book: 2; Civil Parish: Burwell; County: Cambridgeshire; Enumeration District: 8; Folio: 21; Page: 36). He and his wife Ann are both listed as age 50 and living with them are their two youngest children, William 15 and Thomas 10.
Chempat, if Burwell is missing from the 1851 Census, that would explain why I can't find them!
Deb