Author Topic: Occupations they had trouble classifying  (Read 1342 times)

Offline andrewalston

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,938
  • My granddad
    • View Profile
Occupations they had trouble classifying
« on: Saturday 27 June 15 16:56 BST (UK) »
I've just come across an 1851 census entry with an occupation that baffled the Civil Service's attempts at classification.

The original text says "Office cleaner".

These days that would hardly cause a stir, but the Victorian Home Office had never thought of it, and so Ann is classified as a "Labourer" in thick black ink.

Maybe the Home Office was a particularly dirty place, or its staff had to polish their own desks!

Has anyone else found unexpected reclassifications?
Looking at ALSTON in south Ribble area, ALSTEAD and DONBAVAND/DUNBABIN etc. everywhere, HOWCROFT and MARSH in Bolton and Westhoughton, PICKERING in the Whitehaven area.

Census information is Crown Copyright. See www.nationalarchives.gov.uk for details.

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 51,351
    • View Profile
Re: Occupations they had trouble classifying
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 27 June 15 17:05 BST (UK) »
Perhaps 'office' means an outbuilding rather than the present meaning of office as a workplace.

5 (offices) British dated The parts of a house given over to household work or to storage.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/office
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Occupations they had trouble classifying
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 27 June 15 17:11 BST (UK) »
If you look at the classifications of occupations for 1851 at http://www.rootschat.com/links/01fjw/  you will see there is no classification for "office cleaner" so she has been classified as Labourer (branch undefined)  Class XV  Sub-class 1

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,588
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Occupations they had trouble classifying
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 27 June 15 17:16 BST (UK) »
... so ... could they define a "Nightsoil labourer" ( and if you can't fathom out what that'll be, you're no Roots addict) as an Office cleaner - external sanitary offices, perhaps?
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)


Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Occupations they had trouble classifying
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 27 June 15 17:41 BST (UK) »
In the  1881 Occupation Classifications, Order 23 Sub-order 1 was "Persons working and dealing in REFUSE MATTERS." This included;
Town Drainage Service.
Chimney Sweep, Soot Merchant.
Scavenger, Crossing Sweeper.
Rag Gatherer, Dealer


Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk