Author Topic: Ann Catherine Gamble  (Read 1917 times)

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 21:52 GMT (UK) »
 :) No problem would just love to find the Haycock that Emma b c 1861 Wirksworth married, in 1901 still married b Wirksworth she has a lodger Joseph Warwick aged 40' occ Silver Smith
Census ref RG13/4341/94/22
Also her birth/baptism?!
Keyboard86

PS just searched in 1871 for a Catherine ( with phonetic search) on FindMyPast b c 1845 Derbyshire either Street or Smith, always do it that way first!

OK she was the Emma Elizabeth Street 1861 b Belper
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline winstoncunningham

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 22:06 GMT (UK) »
Brilliant !

Will have a look for the Haycock etc and let you know what I find.

Cheers,
WC

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 22:09 GMT (UK) »
Hi again, Emma looks to have married as Emily Street to possibly a Samuel Haycock September qtr 1878 Sheffield 9c 562
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline winstoncunningham

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 22:16 GMT (UK) »
OK - noted !

The great thing about having family from Wirksworth is John Palmer's amazing site - wirksworth.org - probably the best one-place study around.

This from the Parish Records at St Mary's ....Emma Street's christening - Aug 4th 1861.

C 1861aug04 STREET Emma elizabeth=Samuel/Ann catherine(Wirksworth)[Miner],#2120

The marriage was in Q2 so now we know why Kate was married at 17.

Can't see a marriage entry so must have happened elsewhere.

Cheers,
WC




Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 22:20 GMT (UK) »
Hi again, Emily Street aged 19 Father Samuel Street occ Manager
Samuel Haycock 20 occ Cutler? Father John Haycock occ Skilled Artisan married 15th September 1878 Wicker
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline winstoncunningham

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 22:22 GMT (UK) »
Super - thanks again !

This is all very exciting !

WC

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 23:13 GMT (UK) »
Hi you will find Samuel Haycock Married b c 1861 Birmingham in Sheffield 1881, with father John b c 1836 Birmingham
Census ref RG11/4630/32/15
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline winstoncunningham

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 01 December 15 23:54 GMT (UK) »
Great stuff - thanks.
 
WC

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Ann Catherine Gamble
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 02 December 15 17:39 GMT (UK) »
Hi again, I have shown above Emma Haycock Married b c 1862 Wirksworth in 1901 but unable to locate in 1891 or post 1901, but searching for Samuel Haycock b c 1861 Birmingham in 1891 gives this possible :-

Sam Haycock 29 b Birmingham
Sarah A 38 b Sheffield
Samuel T 4 b Sheffield
Sarah A 1 b Sheffield
Residing at Hollis Croft, Sheffield
Census ref RG12/3818/104/8
Again this family unit appears to disappear post 1891?

Also no children with Emma in 1901?
Keyboard86

Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk