Author Topic: Tower at Eastbourne?  (Read 12699 times)

Offline petmas

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,194
  • We wunt be druv
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday 10 February 16 12:29 GMT (UK) »
Thanks for everything so far folks. I'm favouring Crow's Nest as the tower is on a little tump. The notice is illegible no matter how it's played with  :(  .  As to being bought elsewhere- very possible, I've got a nagging idea of a tower at Heathfield Park tho' I doubt it was open to the public in 1905
Mason ( Leics, Lincs, Cambs, Rutland)  Packer( Berks, Middx) Bearne, Vining , Sugar Shugar (Somerset, Pennsylvania & S Wales)

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday 10 February 16 13:01 GMT (UK) »
The notice says,

                      NOTICE
      Do not use for parachute training.
The tower is out of bounds to the military.
     By order, The War Department.

Regards

Malky

Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday 10 February 16 17:18 GMT (UK) »
Thanks for everything so far folks. I'm favouring Crow's Nest as the tower is on a little tump. The notice is illegible no matter how it's played with  :(  .  As to being bought elsewhere- very possible, I've got a nagging idea of a tower at Heathfield Park tho' I doubt it was open to the public in 1905

Pictures of the Gibralta Tower, Heathfield Park on tinternet...it's round and made of stone though :-\
All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday 10 February 16 18:19 GMT (UK) »
The notice says,

                      NOTICE
      Do not use for parachute training.
The tower is out of bounds to the military.
     By order, The War Department.

Regards

Malky

That has to be some sort of clue to the location doesn't it? Can't think where though.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline John915

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,569
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday 10 February 16 23:52 GMT (UK) »
Good evening,
The notice says,

                      NOTICE
      Do not use for parachute training.
The tower is out of bounds to the military.
     By order, The War Department.

Regards

Malky

That has to be some sort of clue to the location doesn't it? Can't think where though.

Wouldn't have thought you needed a parachute from that height ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

John915
Stephens, Fuller, Tedham, Bennett, Ransome (Sussex)
Rider (Fulham)
Stephens (Somerset)
Kentfield (Essex)

Offline John915

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,569
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday 10 February 16 23:56 GMT (UK) »
Back again,

Just picked up e-mail from my cousin, he doesn't know anything about it or it's location, He does however still have contacts in the research section of Eastbourne Historical Society.

Will let you know if they come up with anything.

John915
Stephens, Fuller, Tedham, Bennett, Ransome (Sussex)
Rider (Fulham)
Stephens (Somerset)
Kentfield (Essex)

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #24 on: Thursday 11 February 16 00:18 GMT (UK) »
Good evening,
The notice says,

                      NOTICE
      Do not use for parachute training.
The tower is out of bounds to the military.
     By order, The War Department.

Regards

Malky

That has to be some sort of clue to the location doesn't it? Can't think where though.

Wouldn't have thought you needed a parachute from that height ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

John915

But EVERYTHING'S gone up so much sine 1905!!   ;D ;D ;D
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #25 on: Thursday 11 February 16 00:26 GMT (UK) »
Don't they practice jumping from low heights and landing properly? If that notice is real, I would think the tower must have been somewhere near an airfield or training camp. You don't see that sort of notice on other structures do you?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline barryd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,709
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tower at Eastbourne?
« Reply #26 on: Thursday 11 February 16 02:37 GMT (UK) »
"I imagine the wooden structure would have been taken down some time ago".

I hope so. The Solicitors would salivate at the sight of it. It is a tremendous liability in 2016. Even when it was new people could still vandalize it or fall off it. Unless we can find out what it was, and it served a useful purpose, it seems a little pointless to me.