Yes, thank you. As you say, as much as it can be. I had found some of the same info but discounted it because things didn't add up and then my relative provided some additional information that made things fit together with our/your research. Obviously there are still some gaps/conflicts. Maybe we will never have all the answers. Just a year ago, some of these questions may have been answered but now that avenue has closed. Thank you all again.
Carolyn
No research can ever be stated to be correct unless primary documents are sighted and then we have people who tell lies not only to the registrars, ministers and family which make research difficult. I spend much time on rootschat attempting to help others validate their family history/stories.
Carolyn where are the gaps or conflicts?I think we have a few chatters following this thread and they would be interested as I certainly am.
What part of the research had you discounted?
Elizabeth isn't the birth child of Daniel (Coil/Coyle). Nor will a birth certificate be found for her.
Her father was Joseph
COYLE on the her birth registration. Perhaps she didn't know his given name when asked by the minister for her father's name. Have you accepted the birth registration for Elizabeth Ann
COYLE as your ancestor? Just a yes or no will be OK.
I'm please your relative suddenly provided additional information otherwise I think you would have discounted much of our research.
I'm still wondering what the
S Symbol on the marriage registration indicated.
S. The certificate contains information which may not be published such as:
· Groom or Brides father is deceased
· The Mothers name is stated
· The age is listed in years and months
· A subsequent divorce is listed
· Other unusual information is listed
Quite a lot of the information I posted came from my own resources.
Cando