Author Topic: Thomas and Mary Biggs  (Read 609 times)

Offline Philldw

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Thomas and Mary Biggs
« on: Tuesday 06 December 16 10:40 GMT (UK) »
Thomas and Mary Biggs are shown on the 1841 census located in Portsmouth.The had a son Thomas aged 6 and assuming they were married it would put the date appox 1834.I have looked +/ - 5 years
in all areas but cannot find a marriage record.
Can anyone help?
As a general rule how does one track down a marriage if not in the last area known?
All assistance greatly appreciated.David 

Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,598
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas and Mary Biggs
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 06 December 16 10:50 GMT (UK) »
There is the marriage of a Thomas BIGGS to Mary Ann KING at St. Thomas Portsmouth 5 April 1831.

You may want to follow that one up.

Jebber
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,405
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas and Mary Biggs
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 06 December 16 10:54 GMT (UK) »
If these are two of the children - source 1851 census H0107/1659 f896 p26
then Mary's surname is King

BIGGS, GEORGE    mmn   KING     
GRO Reference: 1842  M Quarter in PORTSEA ISLAND UNION  Volume 07  Page 143

BIGGS, MARY       mmnKING     
GRO Reference: 1844  M Quarter in PORTSEA ISLAND UNION  Volume 07  Page 152
https://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/certificates/indexes_search.asp


Thomas was born Manchester, Mary born Portsea.

Possible marriage from familysearch
Thomas Biggs
Mary Ann King
5 Apr 1831
Portsmouth, Hampshire
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,598
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas and Mary Biggs
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 06 December 16 10:59 GMT (UK) »
You beat me to the births Risie99 ;D ;D
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.


Offline Spidermonkey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,737
  • https://www.apigintime.net/blog
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas and Mary Biggs
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 06 December 16 11:02 GMT (UK) »
As a general rule how does one track down a marriage if not in the last area known?
All assistance greatly appreciated.David

It would really have depended on how common the names were.  If your ancestor was called Augustus Snafflebottom, then chances are there would have been very few people with the same name, so you could use sources such as freebmd or familysearch to do a general search for a marriage of someone with that name.

With more common names it is a little more challenging.  Prior to the GRO handily sorting their birth index out to include maiden names, you might have had to order a birth cert (always good practice anyway just to double check you have the right person etc) which would give the MMN.  Otherwise, as a general rule one would find the couple on all censuses available.  If one was lucky, you might well have found a census with a relative of the wife on it - you might then know the wife's maiden name.  This would mean that you could repeat the process of using freebmd and familysearch to do  general search for the marriage but with two names instead of just one (helpful for more common names, i.e. to search for marriage of Richard Burton would give you quite a few hits.  To search for a marriage of Richard Burton to Elizabeth Taylor would narrow it down).

Hope that makes sense!