Odd census record

[jeanette62]

Hello Helen
Thanks for your reply and for confirming that we are indeed dealing with the same family of
Treaguses.  I've had another look at my tree and yes the baptism year for Hannah should have
read 1882.
I would of course love to send you a scan of the photo of Hannah but it seems that attachments
cannot be made.
Are you by any chance a member of Genes or Ancestry?
I think that I can contact you thro' here and send you a private message which means my e-mail
address would not be made publicly available.  As I'm not too familiar with Rootsweb, just wondering whether it'd be possible for you to send me your e-mail address by this means.
You are right I didn't have Albert Frank on my tree so thanks for that.
Just having a quick look again at my tree and I believe that Harriette Warrington Treagus remarried. Do you think that is so?
Best wishes from Jeanette

[hmclem]

Jeanette - Have sent a private message so hopefully that has come through to you.

I did think that perhaps Harriett had remarried but was not quite sure so never actually added it to my tree. Would that be to William Glue?

[nexttree]

Hi,

I've been researching the TREAGUS family for a few years now and have a Guild of One-Name Studies website for that surname at http://treagus.one-name.net/index.html. I believe that the 1851 census entry you refer to is wrong and William's age should be 46. Hannah's could be read as 44. I've made the same connections as you. If I can help with any more detail please contact me via my website.

Regards, Alan

[hmclem]

Wow thanks Alan. That looks fab.

I will definitely have a good look around your website. You have put a lot of work into it.

Really appreciate you sharing it with me

Thanks

Helen