I like the use of the royal "We", shanreagh.
The 1895 death of REHARI - Wi .... is of course William (REHIAI) - aged 24 years (bc 1871 )
And so as not to confuse or mislead, the 1966 death RIHARI - Makereta- showed her to be 87 years ... born circa 1879.
~ Lu
The name Wi is not always a shortened form of Wiremu. His name may actually have been 'Wi'. Similar to names today where say a boy named Jack does not always have his name as John, as was traditional, but be legally named Jack. I think there may be a clue in the fact that this registration is for 'Wi'. There is no 'of course' about it until the printout has been obtained and checked.
And to clarify, the sentences I wrote about the Rihari surname deaths registered in BDM did
not say the the Makereta registration was the very old one.
1916/10962 Rihari Hemi 90YA
This is very old for instance, with a possible birth around 1826.
It is not the Royal 'we'. The genealogical threads and searching that I have participated in are
always a shared endeavour. We build on the findings of others. So we have moved on in this thread from the odd surname names in some official documents etc to possibly looking at surnames such as Rehari & Rihari. I am surprised you needed to make this comment.