Author Topic: Edward Oxborrow b. Abt 1637 Grundisburgh, Suffolk  (Read 338 times)

Offline catsflap

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Edward Oxborrow b. Abt 1637 Grundisburgh, Suffolk
« on: Monday 25 June 18 10:44 BST (UK) »
Trying to research Oxborrow family.  I believe the above is the father of Stephen Oxborrow (b. Abt 1637), and that Edward was married to Mary Downing (b. Abt 1641).  The Downing name seems incredibly complicated so I don't want to waste my time unless the marriage is correct.  I have seen people connect Mary Downing to all sorts of nobility, which is fascinating, but only if it is right!  I am also trying to define the siblings of Stephen (married to Mary Rowe (b.Abt 1675), as I seem to be accumulating far too many.  Anyone out there have any info please?  Many thanks

Offline bevj

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,064
  • Robert Paterson 1866-1909
    • View Profile
Re: Edward Oxborrow b. Abt 1637 Grundisburgh, Suffolk
« Reply #1 on: Monday 25 June 18 20:26 BST (UK) »
Hi

FamilySearch has children for Edward and Mary Oxborough, including Stephen (christened 10th November 1673) in Grundisburgh.

Mary 1663
Martha 1665
Annye 1668
Edward 1670
Sarah 1679

There are also a lot of Oxborrow/Oxboroughs in Bury St. Edmonds.
I'm afraid that my knowledge of the area is inexistent, so I don't know if they could be the same family.

Bev
Weedon - Hertfordshire and W. Australia
Herbertson, Congalton, Paterson - Scotland
Reed, Elmer - Hunts.
Branson - Bucks. and Birmingham
Warren, Ball, Jones - Birmingham
Fuller, Bourne, Sheepwash - Kent
Brittain - Beds. and W. Australia

Offline catsflap

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Edward Oxborrow b. Abt 1637 Grundisburgh, Suffolk
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 26 June 18 08:12 BST (UK) »
Thanks.  I did have originally have a Mary in the tree but discounted it for some reason.  I have also found an  Amy b. 1665?  I will recheck FamilySearch.