Author Topic: sarum marriage licence bonds  (Read 1389 times)

Offline Katie Hiscock

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
    • View Profile
sarum marriage licence bonds
« on: Monday 01 October 18 19:01 BST (UK) »
can any one explain more about this,

what is a sarum marriage licence bonds

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: sarum marriage licence bonds
« Reply #1 on: Monday 01 October 18 19:06 BST (UK) »
A  visit to the clergyman issuing the licence resulted in three documents, an allegation or affidavit, a marriage bond and the licence. Bonds were a very common legal device. By entering into a bond a person would agree for instance that a statement was true, for a marriage  that there was no "lawful let or impediment" to the proposed marriage. If this was not the case  a penalty was due to the church official concerned, if the marriage did not take place the bond was irrelevant. A marriage bond would mention the two people who wanted to get married, not just one.  By the late 18th Century the penalty was £200. I would expect that they would not have to prove they had the money. After 1823 bonds ceased to be necessary.
See https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Marriage_Allegations,_Bonds_and_Licences_in_England_and_Wales
Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Katie Hiscock

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
    • View Profile
Re: sarum marriage licence bonds
« Reply #2 on: Monday 01 October 18 21:10 BST (UK) »
A  visit to the clergyman issuing the licence resulted in three documents, an allegation or affidavit, a marriage bond and the licence. Bonds were a very common legal device. By entering into a bond a person would agree for instance that a statement was true, for a marriage  that there was no "lawful let or impediment" to the proposed marriage. If this was not the case  a penalty was due to the church official concerned, if the marriage did not take place the bond was irrelevant. A marriage bond would mention the two people who wanted to get married, not just one.  By the late 18th Century the penalty was £200. I would expect that they would not have to prove they had the money. After 1823 bonds ceased to be necessary.
See https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Marriage_Allegations,_Bonds_and_Licences_in_England_and_Wales
Stan




thank you stan

Offline CarolA3

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,126
  • My adopted home
    • View Profile
Re: sarum marriage licence bonds
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 02 October 18 18:15 BST (UK) »
In case you wondering what 'Sarum' means, it's an old name for Salisbury which was the diocese where this licence was issued.

Carol
OXFORDSHIRE / BERKSHIRE
Bullock, Cooper, Boler/Bowler, Wright, Robinson, Lee, Prior, Trinder, Newman, Walklin, Louch


Offline Katie Hiscock

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
    • View Profile
Re: sarum marriage licence bonds
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 02 October 18 18:40 BST (UK) »
In case you wondering what 'Sarum' means, it's an old name for Salisbury which was the diocese where this licence was issued.

Carol


thank you carol