ancestryDNA​ new (at least, to me) features

[Gadget]

 Re the new feature that identifies unlinked trees. This can be very useful but many of them are like the one shown below - sometimes just one, sometimes maybe up to 10, all private.  Could Ancestry not do some kind of search of the tree too see if any names are mentioned - e.g.

if name = private, don't show

[sugarfizzle]

"Could Ancestry not do some kind of search of the tree too see if any names are mentioned - e.g. if name = private, don't show"

The tree itself is likely to have surnames and places, ancestry privatises them as they are still living. They will show up in surname/place search, so to exclude them could be unfavourable.

I know your frustration, though.

Regards Margaret