To summarise, the will had been proved by Ursula Consant, the widow, on 7 December 1633. The children of the testator Richard Consant – William, Richard and Dorothy – had then challenged the will’s validity (we are not told in what way).
In order to consolidate her position in the face of that challenge, Ursula had gone back to court to get confirmation of probate. She had been represented by her lawyer, but the other parties (the children) had not attended court to put their case, despite being duly summoned and given every opportunity to do so, and they were therefore in contempt of court.
In his Judicial Sentence the judge confirmed that, after considering the evidence and consulting with other legal experts, he had found the will to be valid in every way, Ursula’s appointment as executrix was lawful, Richard Consant had been of sound mind when he wrote the will, and any challenge to its validity was groundless.
The Judicial Sentence was copied into the wills register, in order to leave no room for any future doubts. Confirmation of probate was issued on 8 May 1634, in the presence of witnesses Benjamin Cobb and Henry Huffam.
(I think there should be more text, following after your extract labelled Latin9, but it will probably be the standard closing sentences for this kind of document and won't amount to much.)