Perhaps Ruskie could let us all know what indecent Y results her OH experienced?
I think quite a few of us who took both Y & Mt might say we're underwhelmed but maybe we were expecting too much? When you consider that Mt genetic distance 0 might cover 1,000 years (I know, there are exceptions) that's an awful lot of female matches beyond the reach of paper records. Possibly similar for Y? A relative started off as R-M269, refined to R-U106, further to R-Z155 and at the latest, shares with 1 other, BYxxxxx or similar...with absolutely no idea how, where or when they connected. The next Y tree may see them parted...
It's quite understandable that more concentrate on autosomal because it can produce more results that connect with paper and is so much more fun to play with, imo. Of course one shouldn't ignore the ethnicity furore: several peas from the same pod and one has an "Amerindian" segment not shared by any other. Yet if the same data is plugged into another "Gedmatch Admixture", the "Amerindian" vanishes! Interesting pictures abound, do try it for yourselves.
On top of that, how about phasing? Check out Double Match Triangulation (DMT) and to hold and control all your data and to save your drowning in speadsheets, Genome Mate Pro (GMP).
I haven't had such fun for ages...I need to get a life, I know, but circumstances dictate...and I'm another waiting patiently for LivingDNA.