Author Topic: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins  (Read 1730 times)

Offline londonscorpion

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« on: Tuesday 27 November 18 18:01 GMT (UK) »
I have two people who are related first as husband and wife, then as 1st cousins, and then again as 3rd cousins.  As 3rd cousins there are two routes back to the common ancestor. The generations run from 1680 to 1850. If all the sources that link these two people through the generations are correct, would these two cousin relationships add weight to the connections that have been made. 
Clark, Clarke, Batchelor, Diamond, Ruddick,
Yorkshire: Oaks, Denton, Sykes

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,757
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 27 November 18 18:28 GMT (UK) »
What do you mean by "add weight"?

Offline londonscorpion

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 27 November 18 21:41 GMT (UK) »
Add more certainty that the connections are right. For example, on old bmd records you may only have the year and so sometimes it's a bit of a guess
Clark, Clarke, Batchelor, Diamond, Ruddick,
Yorkshire: Oaks, Denton, Sykes

Online KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,100
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 27 November 18 23:09 GMT (UK) »
BMD records (that is Birth, Marriage and Death) are Civil Registration, and always show the full dates on the certificates.
Parish Records (CMB, or Christenings, Marriages and Burials) will also show dates.

Not sure where you have seen just a year?
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)


Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,509
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 28 November 18 00:49 GMT (UK) »
Sometimes I have seen 'just a year' in very old parish registers K - usually where pieces of the page are missing due to damp, mice or just torn, and so all you can glean is an approximation of possibly the month, and usually can see which year it was.
Not sure if this is what the poster meant though.
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 28 November 18 01:54 GMT (UK) »
I have two people who are related first as husband and wife, then as 1st cousins, and then again as 3rd cousins.  As 3rd cousins there are two routes back to the common ancestor. The generations run from 1680 to 1850. If all the sources that link these two people through the generations are correct, would these two cousin relationships add weight to the connections that have been made.

If two people are husband and wife, then that is the significant fact confirmed with the marriage registration, and featured on the family tree chart.  The cousin relationships are consanguineous relationships and there are far far more cousin relations between people who are not married to each other.    Currently, some states in the US continue to have laws that would restrict first cousins from marrying each other. 

Like others replying on this thread,  I wonder what our OP refers to when using the expression :

would these two cousin relationships add weight to the connections that have been made

JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline mrcakey

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 28 November 18 08:20 GMT (UK) »
How can they be 1st cousins AND 3rd cousins?
Houghton - Lancashire, inc. Manchester
Robertson - Angus
Collinge - Yorkshire, Lancashire, USA
Nedderman - Lancashire
Lane/Fryer - Kent

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,958
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 28 November 18 08:31 GMT (UK) »
How can they be 1st cousins AND 3rd cousins?

Through a number of cousin marriages, I have someone on my tree who is a 3rd cousin to me, also a fifth cousin and a fifth cousin once removed.

I wonder what sort of match that would show up on a DNA  test
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: 1st cousins and 3rd cousins
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 28 November 18 08:37 GMT (UK) »
For example ... 1st cousins share at least one grandparent; 3rd cousins share at least one great grandparent.

And  don't forget that 1st cousins can share all four grandparents.... DNA could show them as siblings ...

JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.