Thought it best to continue on this thread as its a similar problem i.e. another DNA link to the same people.
I've more or less given up on trying to find the Thorpe DNA link to my brickwall theory. I even tried Sean's tip (have a glass of wine and another go) but without any luck.
I've just been searching on Ancestry for anyone else with a DNA match via SYMONDS in Sussex. This is my original brickwall, involving my 6xgt grandparents Joseph and Sarah who to all intents and purposes lived in Hambleden, Bucks - first child in 1740. I've never been able to find their marriage or baptisms but had found a couple who married in Ardingly, Sussex in 1731, had 4 children up to 1737 and then - apparently - disappeared from view. Did they move to Bucks? or had I just fitted them around my theory?
Anyway, I've now found another DNA match (admittedly only 5th-8th cousin) who not only has Symonds in her tree but they are from Ardingly! Unfortunately, she doesn't appear to have much more info so I've held off contacting her as yet.
That's two mysterious DNA matches to this area - one very high (33cMs) which took me from New Zealand to East Sussex but then got stuck (hence this thread) and the second which is a much smaller match but is a link to the name as well as the town.
Surely I must be on the right path with my theory - and yet I still feel more proof is needed.
So, do any of you lovely people have access to East Sussex records or are a member of the FHS? Are there any removal orders, settlement orders, wills etc in the name of Symonds (or its many various spellings) which might point me in the right direction? Joseph and Sarah would have moved to Bucks around 1737-40. Joseph's father was Hugh or Hugo and died in 1739 in Ardingly. Are Sussex wills online?
Finally, does anyone familiar with that area of Sussex know of any connection to the Hambleden area of Bucks? I'm assuming they were both agricultural areas - could they have had the same landowner?
Sorry, for the mini novel! Any help would be great.
Jill