Just a correction - the manslaughter actually took place in July 1829.
==========================
Thanks for your post. Yes I do have a copy of the WONDERFUL Fisher Row book by Mary Prior, and it has been a fount of information for my Beesley family.
Also, the book by Giles Brindley - "Oxford, Crime, Death and Debauchery" is a great source. There is a lot in the local and national news about the crime and the miscreant, who escapes to London and is recaptured there and returned to Oxford for trial. I have also looked at various papers from The National Archives relating to his transportation to Bermuda and his return, in my hunt for his identity. And I have also seen a transcript of the Court case.
However - the true identity of Thomas Beesley, convicted for Manslaughter is not proven (in my opinion). Nothing in the Court Papers of the trial or elsewhere actually gives his identity. The only clue is a Petition in 1833 from his father Samuel Beesley (there are several of them) and one comment in a newspaper that he had two children (which does fit <my> Thomas).
Mary Prior (Fisher Row, p 274 line 6-8) suggests this “is probably” my husband’s ancestor, who is also a Thomas Beesley, from Fisher Row in Oxford, b 1801, which seems to match the Thomas convicted and transported in 1830. Also on p 274 she gets the end of his transportation sentence wrong which, I believe, leads her to the wrong conclusion.
However, <my> Thomas Beesley has a child in 1836/7 (or at least his wife Maria does, and both he and she are named in the baptismal record), which is while the convict Thomas Beesley is in Bermuda, going there in 1830 and returning in 1838 and pardoned in 1839. Mary wrongly uses his return date as about 1837.
In 1841 there are three possible Thomas Beesleys - by age
1. one clearly my ancestor, living on Fish Row, with his wife Maria nee Collier and their family,
2. a second living with wife Mary (nee Lee) and children, also on Fish Row,
3. another, with wife Anna living just round the corner on Hythe Bridge Street.
I have not been able to identify this third Thomas, either his birth or a later death, but my hopes and suspicions are that this one is the culprit, not my ancestor.
Of course the convict may not have returned to Oxford.
I do have a lot more info about this case, if you or anyone has more information, or is interested in sharing this puzzle?? I would love to resolve it.
Who are Thomas Beesley, wife Anna, living on Hythe Bridge Street in 1841??? No 3 above???
Pam