Bigamous marriage/divorce proceedings Lancashire WAIN v LOWE

[JenB]

This is the relevant thread -
Threads merged and placed on Lancashire board.

It would be better to ask to have that thread moved onto this board and merged with this one.

[OzzieJoan]

Thanks to MCKHA489 I now know that I can't add attachments to this Forum. And I see in the Help pages that I can't add them to PMs either. So I have started a new Topic in the

RootsChat.Com » England (Counties as in 1851-1901) » England » Lancashire (Moderators: sarah, JDGen) » Bigamous marriage/divorce proceedings Lancashire WAIN v LOWE

RootsChat.Com » England (Counties as in 1851-1901) » England » Lancashire (Moderators: sarah, JDGen) » Bigamous marriage/divorce proceedings Lancashire WAIN v LOWE

Forum and added my attachments to that in the hope that I am doing this the right way. As you can see I've given 2 ways and hopefully one of them will link.

OzzieJoan

[rosie99]

I think that you may need to crop the images just to show the relevant parts.  I have tried enlarging them to read and they just pixilate

[jonw65]

Link to image of Kiely in the 1920 US census. Is it the right one?
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRJ3-7KG?i=40&cc=1488411

1900, Wisconsin,  was mentioned
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-DTJW-67J?cc=1325221

1921 Toronto, third household
http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item/?app=Census1921&op=img&id=e003038091

That one is free on ancestry.ca - will need to log in
https://search.ancestry.ca/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=CanCen1921&indiv=try&h=2482341

[jonw65]

Other thread

Link to image of Kiely in the 1920 US census. Is it the right one?
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRJ3-7KG?i=40&cc=1488411

1900, Wisconsin,  was mentioned
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HT-DTJW-67J?cc=1325221

1921 Toronto, third household
http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item/?app=Census1921&op=img&id=e003038091

That one is free on ancestry.ca - will need to log in
https://search.ancestry.ca/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=CanCen1921&indiv=try&h=2482341

[OzzieJoan]

Thank you JonW I have accessed the links you have posted and they are all the correct ones for 'my' Alice.
Must go and eat now. And then possibly to bed. Thanks for all the help.
OzzieJoan

[OzzieJoan]

This is the relevant thread -
Threads merged and placed on Lancashire board.

It would be better to ask to have that thread moved onto this board and merged with this one.

I will certainly do that JenB but not sure who I should ask to do that for me. Perhaps you could PM me and I will get to it tomorrow afternoon. Thanks so much.
OzzieJoan

[JenB]

This is the relevant thread -
Threads merged and placed on Lancashire board.

It would be better to ask to have that thread moved onto this board and merged with this one.

I will certainly do that JenB but not sure who I should ask to do that for me. Perhaps you could PM me and I will get to it tomorrow afternoon. Thanks so much.
OzzieJoan

It's been done, but for future reference all you need to do is to click on the 'Report to moderator' button (bottom right) and make the request 

[Annette7]

I don't think the Alice Weins/Ewins arriving in 1928 is the wife of Wilfred Wain.

I think the surname of Ewins on passenger list is correct.    Apart from word 'Nottingham' in the given address I think she was indeed going to Bromley, Kent.   Indexes show an Alice Ewins of right age in Bromley, Kent in 1911 and I suspect it was this lady.

Annette