Author Topic: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census  (Read 215 times)

Offline Kerby

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 98
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:03 GMT (UK) »
Born 7/8/1837 as Louisa Sarah Payne. She married William Henry Walsham in 1857 but I can't find a 1861 or 1871 census. Can you help please?

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,991
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:23 GMT (UK) »
Not finding a thing for those years I'm afraid  :-\ 
Hinchliffe Huddersfield Wiltshire

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,123
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:23 GMT (UK) »
Louisa is with her parents at Poplar in 1861.

Class: RG 9; Piece: 307; Folio: 81; Page: 27

Debra  :)

Online CarolA3

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,672
  • My adopted home
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:27 GMT (UK) »
In 1861 she's at 48 Park Street with the PAYNE family.  She's listed as their daughter and there are two grandchildren, William (2) and Emma (1).  Louisa and the two children have been mistranscribed as WITTHAM on The Genealogist, but to be fair, the handwriting isn't clear.

Carol
OXFORDSHIRE / BERKSHIRE
Bullock, Cooper, Boler/Bowler, Wright, Robinson, Lee, Prior, Trinder, Newman, Walklin, Louch

Offline Kerby

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 98
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:27 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Debra, I just found that with her name listed at Wittine???!!!??

Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,123
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:30 GMT (UK) »
The original looks more like WALTHAM to me.  You will get a more accurate list of children if you use the GRO indexes.

https://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/certificates/menu.asp

Debra  :)

Offline Kerby

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 98
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 14:36 GMT (UK) »
On the 1861 census she appears to have a daughter clled Emma, but i cannot find a GRO reference for her or any other information.

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,294
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 16:27 GMT (UK) »
Another child  :-\
WALSHAM, LOUISA  JANE     mmn PAYNE 
1860  June Quarter in STEPNEY  Volume 01C  Page 466

ADDED
WALSHAM, EMILY  SARAH     mmn PAYNE 
1865  June Quarter in POPLAR UNION  Volume 01C  Page 707
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Kerby

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 98
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Louisa Sarah Walsham Missing Census
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 06 March 19 16:56 GMT (UK) »
Would there be any reason to not find a 1971 census for any of the family?