Author Topic: Ancestry - lack of replies  (Read 5028 times)

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 06 April 19 11:18 BST (UK) »
This comes up on a lot of different forums and people are disappointed with the lack of response. You have to remember that Ancestry has a lot of free weekends, so people may have used that to build a tree and then never looked at it again. Also, trees stay on there when your subscription lapses, so unless there is evidence of recent log in, some of those people may even have died.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline pharmaT

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,343
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 06 April 19 13:56 BST (UK) »
I don't bother messaging any more.  I find even those who show up as signing in daily don't reply so a waste of time.
Campbell, Dunn, Dickson, Fell, Forest, Norie, Pratt, Somerville, Thompson, Tyler among others

Offline Jed59

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 06 April 19 15:36 BST (UK) »
well I cant see the point of  joining something like ancs   and then , when someone   says they think you might have a link somewhere,or whatever. dont bother to reply.
Suppose it could be worse...  heard about someone who found a living rellie,  sent a nice letter with proofs..  got a reply saying "Please do not contact  us again. we cannot possibly be related, our social spheres are vastly different"
I'd  have replied  once saying.. does this mean we're not exchanging Christmas cards then?

Offline MiniCooperS

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 06 April 19 15:49 BST (UK) »
Thank you so much for the replies. I feel better now! I get really excited when I find connections but I guess not everyone feels the same. Shame really. One I have messaged a couple of times has my late father in their tree. Still shows no interest despite I see they have logged in. Thank you for welcoming me to the forum.


Offline Kimbrey

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 06 April 19 15:55 BST (UK) »
I have a match "1st - 2nd cousin"  I knew who it was by the first name although I did not recognize her married name and she was in Aus,she is a lot younger than me :)
I waited to see if she would contact me,when she did not I contacted her.
The reply came straight away "g,,,g.. I thought you would be dead by now" ;D ;D

Not sure why she made that assumption as her mother,my aunt,lived to be 100!!

Her daughter bought her the kit as a Christmas gift,She has no tree and currently has no time to pursue things further.

Kim

Offline diplodicus

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 686
  • Remember, no great adventure started with salad.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 06 April 19 18:28 BST (UK) »
Quote
well I cant see the point of  joining something like ancs   

We need to bear in mind that a lot of people take the test who aren't members and are unlikely to be (including both my offspring and one first cousin!!!).
Thomas, Davies, Jones, Walters, Daniel in Carmarthenshire and Ceredigion. That should narrow it down a bit!
Vincent: Fressingfield, Suffolk, Stockton & Sunderland.
Murtha/Murtaugh: Dundalk & Sunderland
Ingram: Cairnie by Huntly, Scotland then Abergavenny, Monmouthshire.
Bardouleau: London - in memory of my stepmother Annie Rose née Bardouleau who put up with a lot from me.
gedmatch.com A006809
Kit uploaded to familytreedna.com B171041
Y-DNA R-M269 & mtDNA U5b1f

Offline Nova67

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 881
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 06 April 19 18:29 BST (UK) »
On a nicer note, tomorrow I am meeting my 5th cousin for the first time for lunch. She is very excited as I am her only known family member outside her immediate family here, having emigrated from England.
I wrote to someone a year ago in response to a comment made on Ancestry. They DNA tested following this and now we exchange regular correspondence and gifts.
Makes up for some of the disappointment.

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #16 on: Saturday 06 April 19 18:32 BST (UK) »
Have a brilliant time, Nova67  ;D
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Nova67

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 881
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry - lack of replies
« Reply #17 on: Saturday 06 April 19 18:53 BST (UK) »
Thank you. Shall do.