Charles Richard CREIGHTON’s admission papers to Vernon commence 26th May 1888, and are very detailed and confronting. They include that
‘the Mother of the said child having been on the 25th May Inst. Convicted of Larcency and sentence to two months imprisonment in Coonamble Gaol. The house where the said child was found being the resort of thieves drunkards & chinamen’ It further notes that information to name and birth (for Charles) was
‘obtained from the District Registrar Coonamble. Information as to religion obtained from parents.’ And
‘Uneducated never attended any school’. …. And much more.
I comment,
May 1888 less Sept 1884 puts Charles at age 3, so there was NO reason for him to be enrolled at school.
The document definitely has ‘parents’ not ‘parent’
The police prosecuted Esther, and she went to gaol the day BEFORE this action against Charles, aged 3. – So prosecute the mother, and then go after the children ….
The document includes this note
‘There are five children none of whom have been inmates of any institution’. And
‘The boy’s health appears to be good’.
And ‘
The day previous to arresting the children (so perhaps same day as arresting Esther) the police had entered the premises and found Esther with
a drunken man, not her husband, lying on the bed and the children were
huddled together in the corner of the room.
May I suggest you go through the earlier thread as I recall going through all this back then. Did you enlist the support of a Member of Parliament for access to the Coonamble Gaol records?
JM